cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/2207898

Did you ever hear the tragedy of WebP The Efficient? I thought not. It’s not a story the GIF gang would tell you. It’s an image legend.

WebP was a new format of pictures, so efficient and so lightweight, it could use modern compression to influence the web pages to actually load faster…

It had such a knowledge of the user’s needs that it could even keep transparency and animations from dying.

The power of modern computing is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural.

It became so widespread… The only thing we had to be afraid of, was people insisting on using formats from the 90’s, which eventually, of course, they did.

Unfortunately, we didn’t teach the noobs everything we knew about compression, then the noobs killed the format by converting it to PNG and sharing that.

Ironic. We could save the web from being too slow, but not from the users.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
92 points

The only problem I have with .webp and .webm is that not that many applications support them and need to be converted first.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

This. Many viewers still dont support it for some reason so despite all technical glory, effectively its often mostly a nuisance. Cmp ogg/vorbis and possibly countless other examples. Adoption is everything for web formats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

No, there’s also the problem that they’re Google developed formats. I think an increasing number of us want to be done with Google as much as possible, and there are good alternatives that aren’t getting the support they need right now to give us that freedom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I understand that but we really fucking need to be moving from jpegif. MP3 and MPEG2 were commercial formats too (actually so was jpeg iirc?) and look where they got us. We just really need someone to get the ball rolling to start using newer formats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

JPEG has always been royalty-free. It just supported arithmetic coding, which at the time was patented. Arithmetic coded JPEGs are exceedingly rare & you’re unlikely to run into any on the Web.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I hate Google too, but if they are proper open specification formats and aren’t encumbered by patents, why does it matter that Google created them? Open format is open format regardless of its creator.

Do these formats have some DRM capability or other nefarious reason to avoid them or is it just because they were created by someone we don’t like?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s like saying that I don’t want to develop using react.js because it was created by Meta.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Why are so many people using image viewers from 1993? Nothing against nostalgia, but…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Discord doesn’t support webp, that’s probably one of the biggest ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Discord profits from big inefficient formats so you buy nitro

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Dammit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Discord does support WebP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

For me, it’s not image viewers, but websites that take photo uploads. None of them that I’ve ever used have supported webp, so I always have to convert to png or jpg.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

At least don’t convert photos to png

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This. What the hell is up with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

What applications are those?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments