You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
96 points

Mass transit should be free.

permalink
report
reply

Fare evasion is like stealing bread. It’s a crime of desperation.

This kind of budgetary indulgence only indicates the MTA doesn’t much like the public of the city it serves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah definitely not. If you’re that desperate where are you even going on the subway? I’ve literally seen homeless people pay the fare. The only time I’d consider it justifiable is if you’re in a rush, the train is right their, and your payment isn’t working. Otherwise like what, where you gonna go and what you gonna do if you can’t even afford $2.75?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

If it was free, conservatives would put more effort into killing it off like they did in the 60s and 70s when they killed off trains and subways in a bunch of cities, killed off the trolley systems in several cities, etc. Otherwise their donors would lose too much money on people switching from driving. But yeah, it’s almost entirely funded by taxes anyway. Would be logical to make it 100% funded, but keeping a small fare keeps it a smaller target of conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yes bad actors are always a problem. So I guess we should never do anything substantial to reform the system because rightwing shitheads will try to sabotage it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I didn’t say that. It’s just that first we need to fix the election system that is totally broken through gerrymandering, funding cuts, re-expanding mail in voting and early voting, making election day a mandatory holiday for all but emergency services, get the big money out of politics by removing personhood from corporations and thus removing their “right to free speech” as well as their ability to donate unlimited funds through various means and possibly even making all election ads paid for by public funds that are equally distributed if requested, etc. Then once everyone can vote without losing their job for having to take off almost an entire day and they can vote for local politicians rather than ones that will mostly be responsible for conservative areas connected to their sliver of the city, we need to organize progressive people to actually do it. But I think once it becomes apparent that their votes actually have some chance of making a difference, it won’t be as hard as it is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

Maybe they should start electing people to charge property taxes correctly to those ultra luxury condos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

America won’t achieve that with such low tax rates

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

In the UK, it’s a tad different. The Tube and buses are nationalised but the National Rail is privatised which explains why it’s shit and yet so expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Luxemburg doesn’t anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Mass transit barely exists in most of America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes. Interestingly US taxes aren’t even low if you factor in what you have to pay for directly, compared to what other countries pay though taxes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Lol have you seen the taxes in the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s like 5% federal only in some states

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Local mass transit should be free. It is already really heavily subsidized, often almost entirely subsidized, so it wouldn’t cost as much as you think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Mass transit cannot be free.

It should however be without toll. It can quite reasonably be funded with tax.

But free? No. Someone somewhere has to pay for the infrastructure and operations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Free to use, funded by taxes. Like how healthcare should work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This seems like needless nitpicking. The end result is the same, it’s still free at the point of use.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Free as in free to use. Just like roads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Roads should be tolled. Every single one.

Governments waste obscene amounts of money building car infrastructure, which loses money with no return.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m curious how much of the budget is covered by fares. I think here in Europe it tends to be roughly 50%. But the trains are much better than NYC and the fares are cheaper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Capitalism makes it not free just like it holds people’s lives hostages to pay a fee to live

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But doesn’t life always come with a fee to pay? If we had no society you’d still have to work in terms of finding food

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

this

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

It’s a service that costs money to maintain

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Damn, if only we paid taxes that could be used for maintenance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Yeah but for it to be free they’d have to raise taxes so it’s better to just privatise them which would lower taxes and provide a better service

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yes it is. Luckily we have a system of taxation. By ‘free’ I mean of course ‘at the point of use’. We could provide 100% subsidies for mass transportation for probably around 100 years before we would approach equity with the subsidies we have given to fossil fuels and private transportation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The reason people don’t use public transport is because right now it absolutely sucks in most places if you want more people to use them then they need to be privatised so a business that actually has an insentive to provide a good service can take over and make them great ( for example look at Japan). This way you can also lower taxes a bit which is great for the economy

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

roads and car infrastructure costs money to maintain, but anyone wealthy enough to buy a car can use it for free

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

anyone wealthy enough to buy a car can use it for free

Anyone with a car is paying additional taxes for fuel and car registration.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ther’s ussually tolls there too

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments