Interesting read. I get where he’s coming from vis a vis training data for LLMs. But if those are the problem, negotiate a solution with those companies or block their crawlers. Don’t kill the apps making the site usable for everyone else.
No doubt, his comments are accurate as far as they go albeit completely out of context. I’d be much more interested in knowing how many of the top 100 subs (rather than top 5000) have reopened. I’d like to know what “top” even means here. I’m sure that 97% of mods don’t use 3rd party apps (according to Huffman) because they mod subs of a few dozen to a few hundred members or their subs are almost completely inactive.
In other words, this is interesting damage control, but it needs a lot more context. And NPR’s quality control and fact-checking are sadly lacking.
npr is such trash though, especially since they stopped airing Car Talk reruns
“Trash” seems a little strong in the current media landscape. And it’s hardly their fault that the Magliozzis wanted to retire.
retiring is fine, but they stopped the reruns. Cartalk was literally the only beneficial thing about npr. npr is basically the cnn of radio and about as reputable.
Honestly, it isn’t reasonable to expect a nonprofit to keep using bandwidth to distribute a dead program. And whether your local station airs reruns is a local decision, not NPR’s. Talk to your local station manager or program director. Failing that, see if WGBH (I think… it may have been WBUR who produced the show) have put the old programs on their website.
Nope. I was a constant listener and eventually, a supporter. That stopped many years ago. They are not what they used to be.
Agreed on all fronts. I even used to work for a member station. I got out just before they fired Bob Edwards for not being young/hip/confrontational/whatever enough. My relationship since has been very much on-again/off-again. Just when I think there’s a spark of the old NPR, they go and step in it. :(
