The federal judge assigned to the election fraud case against former President Donald Trump stands out as one of the toughest punishers of rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
27 points

I’m glad she is tough on the Jan 6 rioters. However, I want her to be impartial. If not then this will turn into a campaign tool for Trump. I already know he will use it as a tool anyways. But it will give those Republicans that are on the fence something to falsely claim as a righteous cause to vote for him.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Judges should be tough on treason. A bold statement, I know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not bold or extreme. I want judges to treat him like anyone else that is up for treason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

We can’t spend our lives afraid of what crazy people will say when we do the right thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m saying more of the crazies that will hurt others thinking they are doing “god’s work.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I agree with being impartial of course. In terms of making him into a martyr of sorts, imo that ship has sailed. They’re so delusional that they’ll turn any possible outcome into a narrative where they were victims of some grand conspiracy. It’s baffling what he can get away with while still receiving fanatic support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Pretty much any result or treatment where Trump isn’t getting metaphorical and/or physical felatio is going to be called out as being biased against him. These people are in a cult, nothing we say or do is going to get them out of it until they have their Waco siege moment, which probably won’t be great for the country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s brainwashing for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah it would be scarier if he got through this unscathed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What Republicans are still on the fence about this and wtf is wrong with them? Is this really a primary concern here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The less radical right. I know that sounds strange but there are some that actually believe in the religions things they say. Due to that they vote Republican. Not the ones that believe in Q or just straight up racist. Not every person on the right is a total POS but the people they vote for are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If not then this will turn into a campaign tool for Trump.

We are well beyond that point right now. He has literally told his cult followers that he is being indicted for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

His cult is a smaller part of people that say they are right leaning. The rest that are like Mitt Romney will side with him if the court turns into a mockery on both sides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is a very good stance to take on paper. But do you really think there will be any significant difference in Trump’s campaigning regardless of outcome? The end result is completely meaningless in the grand scheme of the 2024 election, Trump supporters have already shown a dozen times over that there is literally nothing that could change their stance.

I just want to see him get the same treatment I would in his place… He won’t… But I at least want him to sweat

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m talking about those that will stay home bc they believe he did something wrong. I don’t want the opposite of the Miami federal judge. I want judges to be impartial and fair across the board.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 476K

    Comments