You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
39 points

The only period of diminishing atmospheric Co2 concentration in recent history was the COVID lockdown, so halting production and destroying wealth seems to work ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

The covid lockdown disrupted the global economy, starting WW3 and thereby putting human civilization at risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Are you trying to crack a joke? It’s hard to tell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Did you just blame a future world war on COVID lockdowns?

I can’t imagine unironically agreeing with this

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

End of civilization would solve the problem for once, but I’m afraid we are not so close. The wealthy will adapt and continue business as usual. Only the poor will suffer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I remember the rich during the beginning of COVID saying a lot of us should die so the economy keeps rolling.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The only solution rich people have come up with is lying and pretending normal people are responsible so they will buy greenwashed products that won’t make much an impact. Individual electric cars are highly energy intensive and rely on metals mined by child labor, the real solution (accessible public transit) is simply not profitable, the car lobby won’t allow it. The other solution they have is pumping chemicals into the sky to bleach it and artificially block the sun. Is that really what we want? The US military is the number one polluter, when’s it going to be profitable to end them? It won’t because militarism is where the money’s at. Also, rich people didn’t deal with Covid because of their wealth. Millions died because they wanted people to get back to the office and buying things. The people who got rich were entertainment and tech companies. The vaccine wasn’t developed because rich people knew what to do, it was done because the government paid companies to do it and let them keep the money. They then stopped people from getting access to good vaccines through intellectual property and patents, allowing them to get even more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Well yea, for example in my country some problem solvers got rich during COVID by overcharging the state for imports of medical and hygienic supplies, because our industrial network is so eroded due to globalization-relocalization that apparently we aren’t even able to manufacture some simple face masks anymore. Wealth accumulation never stops, even in a recessive scenario. It just gets accumulated in less hands. (Edit because bad english)

permalink
report
parent
reply

we are not suggesting running around and shooting billionaires, that’s not a revolution, the Bolsheveik revolution didn’t just assassinate the Tsar, there was more.

if saving nature is profitable, why isn’t there an insanely rich person who solved global warming yet?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You can’t just paint targets and hope their absense will make things better; you have to have ultimatums, so that they and their peers have incentive to change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

We are not suggesting running around and shooting billionaires

Then what are the guns in the comic and the title of this post for?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.

Community stats

  • 842

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments