You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

is it from our own point of view or its point of view? other guy said the opposite lol. idk what to believe

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It’s always from our PoV.
We have no idea and no way of knowing what’s actually happening 600 ly. away, right now.
All our measurements are based on the light and radiation we can observe from here. We have no sensors close to it.
So if the paper is calculating supernova in couple of decades, it means the star actually went supernova 600+ years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even if we did have a satellite in orbit around Beetlejuice, its data would take just as long to reach us as the light from the star itself.

This relatively business is annoying. I suggest we just get rid of the whole thing and go back to the ether.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I might be absolutely wrong though, I don’t really know anything… I just checked how far away it is… but if it has gone supernova already, then we might have a chance to see it? That would be amazing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is no way for us to have any information whatsoever about an object until the light (ie, information) has reached us. For all intents and purposes, from our local reference frame, it hasn’t happened until we observe.it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

well TIL

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Astronomy is done from the observer’s point of view.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@beehaw.org

Create post

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 269

    Monthly active users

  • 831

    Posts

  • 4.6K

    Comments