You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-47 points

A lot of these are not exactly clear threats. If you used the same standards I’m sure you could come up with a similar list from the US.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

No, you couldn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points
*

Well, I’m much too lazy to generate a list, but considering feverish claims by sycophantic journalists as threats from the regime is pretty questionable. And of course the US has maintained its preemptive nuclear strike policy, which also appears on this list for Russia several times. So those things alone would be a moderately long list I expect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

So you made it up and now can’t provide a single source to your made up claims?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

@LibertyLizard @AgileLion

Wow, it’s news to me that the US has a nuclear first-strike policy.

Maybe because it’s not the case.

The US is an imperialist bully, but you weaken your case by making false statements.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Yea uh, no. You could not lmao. Please give me a list of the us threatening any other countries this many times publicly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points
*

Why should I? My point is not that the US has made threats, my point is that many of the listed events are not threats and it’s misleading to describe them as such.

Generating such a biased, exaggerated list for the US would be a waste of time, and would constitute propaganda. Just as this list is a pointless piece of propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

You said word for word that you could make a similar list with us threats, but then now you say it would be a waste of time? None of these threats on this list are not credible. These are just article titles, but if you look at each article they all have a direct quote from a Russian head of state threatening the use of its nuclear arsenal against the west. Also, defending Russia by saying a peice of propoganda is pointless is so laughable I could cry. You read the articles and not just the titles right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Lmao, from

A lot of these are not exactly clear threats. If you used the same standards I’m sure you could come up with a similar list from the US.

to

Generating such a biased, exaggerated list for the US would be a waste of time

Aka “I’m having trouble sourcing my own claim so just trust me bro”

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

I don’t even know what that means but I’m pretty whatever you think about me or my views, it’s not correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

The US doesn’t have to make nuclear threats since they have an overwhelming advantage in non-nuclear firepower.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

you don’t make a threat that you don’t act upon later, this undermines your credibility

edit: you also don’t make unclear threats for the same reason, especially when it comes to nukes

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Seriously, it’s Interrogation 101

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

@atlasraven31 @skillissuer

Forget interrogation, it’s parenting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I guess I was being charitable. I would not classify many of them as threats at all. Though some clearly are, which is dangerous and reprehensible. But this list is highly exaggerated and gives a false impression of Russian behavior unless you read the individual fine print.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m curious, by the way. When can you come up with a similar list from the US regarding nuclear threats?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

a threat where russia has no balls to follow through is still a threat

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

YeAh, WhAtAbOuT tHe US? DiD aNyOnE mEnTiOn US BaD yEt?

Rubles please daddy Putin

permalink
report
parent
reply

NonCredibleDefense

!noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

Create post

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be nice

Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a “credible” source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it’s non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don’t care if you’re Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don’t want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how “open source” and “easy to find” it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody’s art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art’s source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a “haha people that I hate died… haha” punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don’t be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

Community stats

  • 4.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 24K

    Comments