You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
4 points
*

Any examples? Sounds like you mean the reason why one is excluded from the primes because of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

No, he’s right. “For any odd prime” is a not-unheard-of expression. It is usually to rule out 2 as a trivial case which may need to be handled separately.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat's_theorem_on_sums_of_two_squares

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2047029

https://www.jstor.org/stable/2374361

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not unheard of no, but if you have to rule out two for some reason it’s because of some other arbitrary choice. In the first instance (haven’t yet looked at the second and third one) it has to do with the fact that a sum of “two” was chosen arbitrary. You can come up with other things that requires you to exclude primes up to five.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Okay? Like I said, it’s usually to rule out cases where 2 is a trivial edge case. It’s common enough that “for any odd prime / let p be an odd prime” is a normal expression. That’s all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I just remember it from numberphile, I don’t remember what videos sorry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Wow that was fast I just edited my previous comment and you probably mean “1 and prime numbers” by numberphile with james grime.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments