You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
30 points

How does Ukraine start negotiating with a country that has invaded theirs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Probably the same way that’s been done for centuries? Armistice, followed by a peace treaty?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Who the fuck would trust Russia in an armistice. They neg on deal after deal. Hell, they promised not to invade Ukraine if they gave up their nukes. Look how well they stuck to that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Ukraine violated both Minsk agreements

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Many wars have ended with one side accepting a surrender to a country they hate ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Which is?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

That vatnik is a troll, astroturfing for the Russian government, or an idiot. Whatever it is, really not worth engaging.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

The same way anyone starts negotiating with anyone: open a dialogue and exchange demands, and then work to make concessions and compromises. They won’t do that, though, because then the infinite money spigot from the US will shut off because America doesn’t want this war to ever end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

You tell me where you live, I’ll break into your house and steal half your stuff.

Instead of fighting back or calling the police, we can negotiate so I can have half your stuff. Sound good?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-25 points

I dunno, do you have nuclear weapons that could cause the apocalypse?

Countries aren’t people. The scale the work on is much greater.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

I doubt Ukraine will demand anything less than Russia pulling out of previous held lands. Russia will doubtless demand all lands it currently occupies (and maybe even ones it claims but does not occupy). Russia’s demand could be cast as peace, though really it involves giving a massive portion of Ukraine to Russia. And if you’re thinking that might be temporary… well, just ask Finland, which lost 9% of its territory to a peace agreement in the Winter War after the Soviet Union invaded them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

I doubt Ukraine will demand anything less than Russia pulling out of previous held lands

I doubt Ukraine will demand anything, losers don’t get to decide anything.

NATO has been given the opportunity to negotiate with Minsk 1/2 and the peace talks back in April 2022, now they’ll reap what they’ve sown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You don’t have to guess. They did publish just those demands. https://kyivindependent.com/zelensky-ukraines-peace-plan-can-help-end-other-wars/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

They’d each have their own demands, and then negotiations would be finding a middle ground between “Ukraine gets everything it wants” and “Russia gets everything it wants”

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

You think Ukraine should make concessions with the country that invaded them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

Yes because they cannot win on the battlefield and have lost an enormous amount of lives. Just because Russia is adversary to the US does not mean we should send 100,000’s of young people to the grave. (Meanwhile safe over in the states we wave Ukrainian flags and call them heroes as we leave them dead or mangled)

So yes reaching a compromise even if Russia was the aggressor is in the best interest of the people left in Ukraine.

Would you rather use our weaponry and intelligence and money to prolong this war for 10 years … just to have the same outcome but 20x the number of casualties?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

For the sake of peace, yes, I think they should be willing to make concessions. That’s how negotiations work.

If you refuse to offer anything you aren’t really negotiating. You’re just issuing demands with no exchange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Yes. That’s literally how peace negotiations work. The alternative, winning the war, precludes the necessity of peace negotiations. All negotiations in the history of negotiations are negotiations between aggressor and agressee.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 6.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 125K

    Comments