“This was not reckless driving. This was murder,” the judge said before she read out Mackenzie Shirilla’s verdict Monday afternoon.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-30 points

This is why suicidal people are dangerous, it’s a relatively small change from killing yourself, to killing others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

This is why pastry chefs are dangerous, it’s a relatively small change from baking your bread, to baking others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This is why being baked while baking with a baker is dangerous. You get too baked and you might get baked by the baker for making bad cakes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Baking bread and stuff is easier. Have you seen hot fat people have gotten? No way I am getting an adult into my oven.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

@ryathal @agressivelyPassive

Have suicidal ideation is in no way, shape or form the same as being the perpetrator of a murder-suicide. Neither is being suicidal a lead-in to becoming a murderer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Driving a car at 100mph into a building is more than ideation. That’s attempted suicide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What a ridiculous take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

As such, it is clear that suicides tend to have high levels of aggressive–destructive impulsive behaviours, generally referred to as impulsive–aggressive behaviours. These have been operationally defined in suicide studies as a tendency to react with animosity or overt hostility without consideration to possible consequences, when piqued or under stress.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1277022/

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Did you read anything else in that paper…? The words around that statement? Even the abstract?

Or did you google what you wanted to see and post the result, because that paper is not about people harming others whilst attempting suicide. It is barely tangentially about that.

(it’s about the impact of aggressive-impulsive tendencies on the suicide…r themselves)

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No there may be a small chance of collateral damage, such as this case. But suicidal thinking does not make you think of killing others. You’re clearly lucky enough to have never had suicidal ideation, but it never comes near the kind of thoughts that want to kill others

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

It changes when it comes to acting. If you have the gun to your head, shooting someone telling you to stop is also highly likely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Let’s see some stats on that one because being an abusive murder is a lot different than suicidality.

There is no correlation between her wanting to kill people and her potential suicidality. They just coincidentally line up in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

If you feel that way, you might be the dangerous one

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Now this is just plain stupidity

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a relative who was recently given a DUI.

They went to the store, sober, and bought a handle of vodka (1.75 liters) consumed the vast majority, and drove around.

He wanted to die in a head on collision. Selfish fuck.

I don’t have a problem with people having the freedom to decide enough is enough, but don’t harm others in the process, at least more so than the death would cause. Especially innocent unrelated people.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 524K

    Comments