Its even worse when you force Firefox to use wayland its icon doesn’t even show.

Edit: Oh since everyone now is confused; I only have the flatpak version of Firefox installed yet it doesn’t use the pinned icon and doesn’t even use the firefox icon under wayland at all.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

Sounds more and more like flatpak is a distribution atop of a distribution.

Good you can share libs, although I can’t see sense in sharing more than the absolute basic libs, and even then some applications will need different versions of the basic libs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What is your opinion on Nix?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

From what I gather nix is more of a next generation package manager than a application container/sandbox which means potential security problems with old libs could be less, or rather they are probably at the same level as rpm/deb.

I don’t see any problems with rpm/deb/etc. ending up getting the boot by nix or another package manager just because they are better, that’s just evolution.

As someone said about flatpak/snap that their ‘hidden’ strength is distribution of proprietary software, that’s fine by me if that’s the main usage of them.

The sandbox feature can be solved by SELinux/docker/and several other ways depending on usecase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sandboxing is not the main feature of Flatpak/Snap, being able to ship an app for various distributions without having to configure them separately is. Docker/Podman can do that, but then you would actually be shipping an entire distro.

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 69K

    Comments