AMD denies blocking Bethesda from adding DLSS to Starfield | Starfield DLSS mod locked behind a paywall::undefined

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
9 points

I don’t need a side by side to know the difference. DLSS is better in performance hands down. To get the same performance with FSR I have to sacrifice other settings if I can get there at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

yeah, some people might tell, I don’t think it’s worth the trade-off of excluding a large part of the market.

NVIDIA doesn’t even respect their own user base. I have a 3080 and can’t use DLSS 3. I’ll keep supporting open technologies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I got a 3080 and I would never want to use DLSS 3 anyways. Keep that stupid ass fake frame generation away. I can put up with upscaling since it’s at least a true rendered frame, but that’s pretty much where I draw the line. Fake frames might make it feel smooth, but I’m not into this hobby for the feels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

that’s fair, I’m absolutely in it for the feels haha

I just play to have a good time

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Nobody wants exclusion of any technology, thats the entire point. Especially when its been shown repeatedly that once you implement one of the 3 (fsr, dlss, xess) techs, the other 2 take almost no effort to add in as well. So little effort that modders have managed to shove them in to games that exclude them for whatever reason, sometimes achieving it in a matter of hours.

All that said… Dlss is definitely better quality than fsr. “Some people might tell” is an understatement.

Your 3080 cant run frame generation because it wouldn’t improve your framerate with that gpu architecture. Just like software dlss wont improve framerate on a 1080.

Nvidia isnt some boogeyman holding back these techs because they just want to force people to buy new cards. They are definitely making tech that only works on the newest cards to try and get more sales, dont get me wrong, but its not arbitrary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

DLSS 3.5 on the 20 and 30 series should be interesting, though

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No one is saying FSR should be excluded.

Though if there’s only going to be one hardware agnostic upscaler then I’d rather it be XESS than FSR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

afaik it has the same problem of DLSS of being exclusive though

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I haven’t built an all AMD rig since the early 00’s. It’s time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

No exclusives at all are as bad for the gamer economy as only exclusives.

I’m interested in the next version of FSR, it’s rumored to include frame generation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No exclusives at all are as bad for the gamer economy as only exclusives.

Can you elaborate on that? I don’t see a clear benefit of exclusives to the user base or industry in general, only to those involved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Tell that to people running a 1080Ti or 1660. They can’t have dlss but fsr works great for all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m not against open formats that aren’t hardware dependent. I’m just disagreeing that a difference can’t be seen other than side by side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The problem is its artificial performance. Frame generation that makes your fps counter have a bigger number isn’t the same thing as your GPU being able to sustain that bigger number through actual performance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The question is do I care? Yes these are technically not real frames but if I dont see the difference why does it matter. I personally don’t care as long as the frames look good and I have enough of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah and that’s what Nvidia is banking on… Literally. People continuing to buy Nvidia GPUs under the idea that it’s a more powerful experience while using tricks and locking features behind closed source BS drives up prices and continues the consumer driven system that screws everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do fake frames process inputs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m reposting my old comment regarding DLSS frame-gen

If it can help me maintain a more stable FPS that would be a boon. If I’m playing a game with unstable frame rates with a lot of stuttering I usually get a headache after one hour. So if frame gen can help my PC run games at a more stable frame rate, then I’m all for it. The first gen implementation of it may be shitty. But after a couple of generations it can be good.

Look at where DLSS is now, DLSS is objectively shit but since DLSS 2 in some cases it can improve image quality. I game on a 1080p 380hz screen, and when I’m playing games with upscaling like DLSS or FSR, I’ll run the game at 4k and then run the upscaler on performance mode which is basically rendering the game at 1080p. The results are much better than just running native 1080p.

That being said, having a more consistent frame rate will make your experience better. Not having an input lag difference won’t be a problem in single player games, as the difference will be under 100 ms anyway (F1 drivers have 200-300 ms reaction time) so it won’t make too much of a difference.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 542K

    Comments