You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
34 points

I agree with you until you said to nationalize Uber eats lol. Just stop using it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Yeah, we can just go back to the restaurant hiring their own delivery people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Except almost none of them did. You’re suggesting going back to having next to zero food delivery options in a world that continues to see COVID spikes and could have future localized lockdowns. I also think this overlooks how much of a QoL increase these services are for people with limited transportation options or mobility problems or other health issues making it hard for them to get out of the house. These services are more than just conveniences to them. They are massive upgrades to their lives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Maybe it’s different where you live, but over here many restaurants did have their own delivery service before Just Eat etc. entered the market. In the beginning, they made things cheaper and easier for the restaurants. But recently, I read a lot about how they increased the fees for the restaurants, who would encourage customers to go back to using their own website instead. Enshittification as always.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It’s a useful (though non-essential) service that leans toward a natural monopoly. Nationalisation or heavy regulation are the solutions to this.

Under regulation, profits flow to shareholders. Under nationalisation, they flow to treasury. Practicality of nationalisation in the current climate aside, I know which I’d prefer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If they nationalize Uber before Amtrak, I’ll blow a gasket

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I certainly can’t disagree with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In what way is it a natural monopoly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Economies of agglomeration, similar to Amazon. Having one app to order everything from is very convenient and the average person prefers that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No, just let it die. Please don’t force the rest of us to pay for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s a profitable service, like the post office was before they were sabotaged with pension requirements. Users would still be the ones paying, but a greater portion of the profits could go to the workers, and the remainder would go to public projects and other government expenses. That would be preferable to the services being used to continue drawing wealth and power from the working classes to the already wealthy and powerful. The only time it might end up subsidized is if it had to be commandeered for a public use purpose like delivery of food and living essentials during a disease outbreak.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why not both

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments