You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
32 points

Can we please get a non-fascist under 50?

Please?

permalink
report
reply
19 points

AOC, please.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

She won’t meet the minimum requirements before 2024.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Minimum is being 35 and she’ll hit that 23 days before the election:

October 13th, 1989.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sure she does. The issue is that she won’t run against a sitting Democratic president.

My hope is that she runs in 4 years. I can’t think of anyone who would even come close to being as good a candidate or president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sure she will. Someone already clarified this in this very thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Nope, AOC is useless just like Sanders.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Useless? Why? Because they are choosing party unity to prevent the country falling into the hands of a fascist criminal?

Give me a break. I don’t like Biden one bit, but NO ONE was going to dethrone him in a primary, so it’s better that they go into this with a united front.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ARNYzxVxGQQ

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

John Stewart is over 50, but he would be a great option IMHO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I see him similar to Sanders where they will give up their power and give in to the DNC easily over time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

There is Pete Buttigieg, though he’s an incompetent hack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The best and most accomplished Transportation secretary in U.S. History and you call him incompetent? Interesting take, can you name any former Transportation secretary that was even half as good as Pete?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Uh…really? We’ve got planes running into each other while on the runways. I wouldn’t run around excited about his tenure in transportation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s way too harsh. Pete is an opportunist, and opts for politics over principle to a degree that made me dislike him in the last primary… but he’s not incompetent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Incompetent is the correct word. He’s a soft R rather than a D.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Have you seen what he has done with the airlines and train disasters?

Did you miss all the news going on with airlines/trains?

He is incompetent and just like any other politician with no real values, just like all the democrats and republicans.

They give in to the fame and the wealthy class.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments