Would you all explain to me how removing content we expect to have access to is a ācost savingsā measure?
The following is from the Willow Wikipedia page, which led me to the linked URL:
The series was removed from Disney+ on May 26, 2023, amidst a Disney+ and Hulu content removal purge as part of a broader cost cutting initiative under Disney CEO Bob Iger.
Iāve been abroad for a month and earned some time off afterwards. One of my kids reminded me that we never finished Willow, so I said āletās do it now!ā The show wasnāt perfect for many reasons, but I wanted to finish it for nostalgiaās sake and my child legit found it interesting. Lo and behold, the series isnāt on Disney+ any more!
A quick search later, I see the above referenced quote linking to the article associated with this postā¦ which only made things worse. The Mysterious Benedict Society was something my whole family could watch and enjoy without arguments! Turner and Hooch was dorky, but something my youngest loved and it was a super safe and easy pick for us bond over.
This post isnāt about whether the shows are good. And it isnāt about how nearly every show I like ends up cancelled. The point is that I paid for access, they were then quietly removed (for various platforms), and I have zero understanding as to how this saves these companies money.
Would someone explain?
P. S. Yes, I know this is old news. However, this is just how I am. Iām not up to date with anything in the entertainment world. I intentionally wait a few seasons for things because I loath when shows are cancelled after a season. (Iām looking at you, Firefly.) Iām the same way with books, often waiting to read a trilogy after its published because I donāt like the wait in between books. (Thanks, Rothfuss).
I just donāt take cancellation wells, especially when I was on top of everything including summer podcasts and such. (Now anything with the names Abrams, Lindelof, or Cuse makes my skin crawl.)
I know. Iām weird and stuff.
I thought about bandwidth as an explanation, butā¦ in theory, what Disney would like is for all the people who arenāt watching X to go and watch Y instead, and assuming the same 4k video quality, wouldnāt the bandwidth cost the same either way? Unless theyāre genuinely counting on people using their service less if they offer a smaller range.