It’s just suspicious man.

I mean, its layers of suspicious staked deep. Like, how do I make any kind of evaluation wrt a video posted on YouTube by an account attached to some data I can’t determine the veracity of from tip to tail? The fact that the narrative is clumsy and fake-sounding out the gate only makes it easier to dismiss the whole body of information as bullshit.

I don’t know exactly what went down on 9/11 and its likely many of us will never know.

I mean, we know four passenger airliners were hijacked and used as suicide missiles. We know the two largest buildings in NYC were leveled. We know the hijackers were primarily from Saudi Arabia. And we know the political aftermath of the event was used to pursue enemies of the US State (who were, coincidentally, not from Saudi Arabia).

But, like, if George Bush Jr and Dick Cheney wanted to trick people into invading Iraq with a false flag attack, there are a whole lot of ways they could have done it better.

If you go digging for coincidences, you’ll find them no matter where you look, proportionate to however much effort you spend searching. It doesn’t mean anything unless you have a specific hypothesis that could be backed up by some coincidences and refuted by others.

Here, go read Unsong. You’ll have a good time, and maybe it’ll help get my point across.