You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
269 points

What a disingenuous statement. By not agreeing to do it he is complicit in major acts of war, i.e. whatever attacks the Russians do with their fleet. What a tosser.

permalink
report
reply
56 points

so while I hate this guy, starlink is complicit in the war either way. either for russia, or for ukraine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

War is peace.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Musk is love.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-144 points
*

Starlink was specifically agreed for civilian use only. It’s the Ukraine who tries to breach that agreement, SpaceX simply doesn’t want to be accused of exporting weapons

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

That’s a bullshit excuse used by Melon’s fan boys.

Whether the technology is restricted by ITAR isn’t based whether it was ever used as a weapon, but whether the US government thinks it can be used as a weapon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

And the US government was left scrambling to get a formal contract in for Ukrainian access after Musk started to publicly spout pro kremlin shit. So there’s no way an ITAR argument could fly: the DoD wanted a contract to help ensure starlink availability for fucks sake, especially since Musk proved unreliable and a useful idiot for Putin’s wildest assplay desires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

but whether the US government thinks it can be used as a weapon.

That’s even worse because US government can change it’s stance on starlink any time - which would be disaster for SpaceX

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

Yeah, if a much larger country was invading, shelling apartment buildings, mining the fuck out of farmland and murdering thousands of people, I’d probably breach a ToS.

Also, that sounds a bit absurd considering he just got the US DoD to pay for Ukraine’s starlink service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also that larger country is firing missiles from ships in the Black Sea, and many of those missiles do kill civilians.

Also using those ships to disrupt grain shipments which is causing issues with the food supply world wide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No it wasn’t. The Pentagon pays for the service explicitly as military aid to Ukraine. Since, you know, Russia blew up a lot of Ukrainian infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Saying ‘the Ukraine’ gives away your loyalties, tovarisch.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Enough Musk Spam

!enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

Create post

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

Community stats

  • 3.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 397

    Posts

  • 7.3K

    Comments