Some interesting stuff here, including links to more studies showing similar results in different countries.

The summary is that the reason motorists break more laws is that speeding is so common.

I don’t think this is because motorists are all evil and cyclists are all saints. Probably, the reason motorists break speed limits is that it can be relatively difficult to keep cars below the speed limit. It’s all too easy to absentmindedly speed up. It’s also, perhaps becuase of this, widely seen as socially acceptable to break the speed limit (speaking anecdotally).

One interesting thing here, which may not surprise regular readers of Fuck Cars, is that better cycling infrastructure leads to less lawbreaking by cyclists. As is often the case, it’s the design of roads and cities that changes behaviour, not abstract appeals to road users to be sensible!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-10 points
*

It seems rather obvious. Bicycle laws are less strict, so it’s “harder” to break them.

edit: what a bunch of dumb ass replies. no I won’t respond to any of them

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Cyclists adhere to the same rules of the road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not in all cases, e.g. the “Idaho stop” or laws that allow cycling on the sidewalk or proceeding on red light after a delay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re mentioning extra laws that still need to be followed. They just replaced other vehicular laws. They’re still able to be broken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

In my experience, there are plenty of cyclists out there (and I’m sure it’s not the majority, but enough for me to notice) who are “traffic” when it suits them, and also “pedestrians” when it suits them.

Mostly, bike messengers in Boston are dicks. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s just describing the cyclists who break rules though. It doesn’t mean they are required to follow fewer laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

source: trust me bro

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Says the troll who didn’t even read the headline of the post before posting just because they saw a car and cycle in the same picture.

Beyond that, I responded to each of their points. If you want a source, ask them to provide them and I will give a rebuttal. I responded to the amount of information they provided. I didn’t see you asking them for a source, but you already have shown you’re obviously biased and don’t actually care about real discussion. Otherwise you wouldn’t just interject an opinion into a topic without even knowing what’s being discussed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Hmm, I don’t know about that. Cycling over a pavement or through a red light is much easier on a bike than in a car!

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

edit: what a bunch of dumb ass replies. no I won’t respond to any of them

You seem lovely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Explain how bicycle laws are less strict in Denmark, please?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I personally love a bit of wanton furious cycling!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

And far, far, fewer of them

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Create post

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn’t choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don’t use slurs. You can laugh at someone’s fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don’t post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn’t a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 712

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments