You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

Linux people on suicide watch when they see someone using plan9

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not many people have actually met that plan9 using guy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Eric S. Raymond carved Plan 9’s headstone 20 years ago:

The long view of history may tell a different story, but in 2003 it looks like Plan 9 failed simply because it fell short of being a compelling enough improvement on Unix to displace its ancestor. Compared to Plan 9, Unix creaks and clanks and has obvious rust spots, but it gets the job done well enough to hold its position. There is a lesson here for ambitious system architects: the most dangerous enemy of a better solution is an existing codebase that is just good enough.

Raymond predicted subsumation as legacy:

It may well be that over time, much more of Plan 9 will work its way into Unix as various portions of Unix’s architecture slide into senescence. This is one possible line of development for Unix’s future.

I wouldn’t call these a ringing endorsement of envy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m currently using parts of plan9 (such as acme, plumber, etc) and can confirm

permalink
report
parent
reply

linuxmemes

!linuxmemes@lemmy.world

Create post

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:
Community rules
  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

Community stats

  • 7.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 70K

    Comments