Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-22 points
*

That all sounds like brigading emotional nonsense. In fact, there were strong reasons for Russia to invade. It is probably true that Russia was manipulated into invading, it had no choice because of strategic decisions made by Ukraine. It’s a shame none of the people you talked to were able to argue the issues sensibly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Lol Ukraine strategically decided not to surrender their territory, thus manipulating the peaceful Russians to invade

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Why should Russia strategically be required to invade exactly?

I’ve never heard a cogent argument on this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s because Russia sees NATO as a threat and wants to take control of Ukraine to keep buffer states on the west side. Also, to keep it’sblack sea fleet safe. Why it happened now and not sooner or later - nobody knows. The official reasoning, of course, is bullshit, just like with any other war. Not the worst one, though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Most people haven’t. We all have a filter bubble.

Here is a first draft, my attempt to provide the missing context. Please leave comments on anything bad or missing you notice. https://lemmy.ml/post/4848742

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

That is just a list of Russian propaganda points. There is no evidence for any of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Ask Jens Stoltenburg. He just fucked up and bragged about how he forced them into it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Okay, but you didn’t actually answer the question, you just pointed to the geopolitical equivalent of blurry sasquatch footage. What’s the strategic logic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Well here is your chance. Argue this issues sensibly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Probably the tired line of NATO expansion fears. How’d that work out? Does Russia have more or less NATO countries near their borders? The invasion itself is the best sales pitch NATO could ever need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

This just supports that explanation? Use your brain man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It is probably true that Russia was manipulated into invading, it had no choice because of strategic decisions made by Ukraine.

Of course Russia had a choice. Not invading a country is the easiest thing to do. I do it every day, and I have nowhere near the power and resources that Vlad Putin does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

Exactly why the choice is so easy for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

What do you think would’ve happened if Russia hadn’t invaded?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean look, it’s a nation we talked in to giving up it’s nuclear weapons in exchange for protection and recognition by us. We really had no choice but to invade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Background? Link?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments