You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-25 points
20 points

That is not saying that Germany is abusing the law, just that they have an ineffective implementation that shitty countries could use as an excuse to enact their own abusive practices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

you can’t bring facts and actually reading their source to the discussion, you are supposed to just agree!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Norway

Honestly, I’d rather deal with people abusing hate speech laws and punishing them for abuse than to not have legal protection from hate and discrimination.

The past 200+ years have shown that the founding fathers’ absolutism and interpretation of social matters in terms of speech alone is faulty. It didn’t take into consideration the failings of the people as a whole and allowed for genocide, slavery and civil war, and enabled the very same tyrannical government they sought to oppose.

And this is because it’s not a speech issue. It’s an intent issue, and society needs to be completely restructured to account for intent, which despite popular belief is actually pretty easy to determine.

Banning Nazis is the first step toward that necessary change. And if social and moral progress is to continue, it must.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Here’s the thing, I agree that hate speech is bad. But then I look at countries like China and think “I like having freedom of speech”.

How about when a republican gets in office, and he gets to define hate speech?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Here’s the thing. I used to think freedom of speech was a good idea. Then I saw the rise of fascism in the U.S., saw how close to genocide we are, and saw those same Nazis were establishing the very authoritarian government the Constitition claimed to prevent with its own tenets like freedom of speech, and realized preventing tyranny is not as simple as that.

The Nazis you’re protecting already are in office and defining acceptable speech, like Florida, where one of your own is having LGBTQ+ books banned outright.

If this was about freedom of speech, you’d be calling for the Nazis to be banned on those grounds, yet here we are.

With you defending your brothers exploiting our greater understanding of social dynamics to subjugate and kill us all.

Here, I’ll prove it to you. Answer this question honestly, no vagueries, something specific, quantifiable and easy for other people to determine:

What words could we say to you right now to convince you to stop commenting in the thread and go away silently?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Comic Strips

!comicstrips@lemmy.world

Create post

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

  • The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author’s website, for instance).
  • The comic must be a complete story.
  • If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
  • You may post comics from others or your own.
  • If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
  • The comic can be in any language, but if it’s not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post’s ‘body’ field (note: you don’t need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
  • Politeness.
  • Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.

Web of links

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 55K

    Comments

Community moderators