You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
68 points

In the United States at least, your local government’s public hearings for new housing developments kinda begs to differ.

People will demand the homeless be eliminated from their area while simultaneously opposing development of housing or shelters for the homeless in their area.

So maybe you’re right though: they don’t hate the apartments more, they simply can’t make up their mind on which they hate more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I agree but want to say everyone jumps to homeless. There are a ton of normal people that are suffering from high rent, lack of options, etc. We need to think about way more than homeless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How about we start with the homeless instead of biting off more than we can chew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Most people think homeless as jobless, etc. But when we have people with entirely ok jobs that can’t afford rent (see people living in their cars), addressing basic normal housing addresses both for a startling amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So it sounds like zoning laws are the problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

In some cases. But even proposed changes to zoning laws can get this kind of opposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Aside from zoning laws, there’s the lack of a unified federal intervention. This prevents any one area from addressing the local homeless issue because any area that takes steps to address it will consequently absorb more homeless individuals from other places in the country. For example, if a city in California develops a program to house any homeless individuals, then homeless individuals from other cities and states will be more likely to go to said city to get housed. Even worse, there are states that would actually pay for their transportation. What would happen is that either the city would have to solve a much larger homeless problem as new homeless move into town, or the initial wave of homeless people will be house while the new arrivals and homeless will stay homeless, leaving a continued homeless problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So conservative NIMBYs are the problem?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I think it’s more so that people don’t want an apartment complex built in their backyard, not that they are opposed to them being built in an area where there is proper infrastructure

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

NIMBY!!

Where do you place the proper infrastructure then? It’s always going to be in someone’s “back yard” as you put it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Well there’s considerable difference between an apartment complex in a suburb not designed for heavy traffic and less developed areas where there’s room for expansion for infrastructure.

We can’t expand roads in my area, either for an extra lane (which I know is a sin) or for buses because it would be right up on houses at that point.

However, just a few miles down the road on the main drag, there’s undeveloped land that would be perfect. Build it there.

When I say “backyard” I mean literally in your backyard. Instead of name calling and downvoting, have a fucking conversation and ask in a respectful manner what somebody means. Stop being a douche because you automatically assume somebody who thinks slightly differently than you is wrong.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 8.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments