You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Why can your body digest new born babies and dogs? Why can your body sexually violate them? Dumb take. You dont derive ethics from what your body is physically capable of doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That escalated quickly…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

As quickly as it went off-track…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Nice straw man argument you got yourself there.

I was clearly referring to the digestive system, which is the part of the body that processes food, but as I used the word “body” you found something to latch onto and went off a tangent talking about raping animals and babies (babies specifically, Jesus fucking Christ, what’s on your mind, man?).

My point is that our “body” is able to sustain itself on a diet that includes animal meat, out body has evolved to be able to process it.

I never said that we should eat our pets or everything made out of meat. Besides, while I don’t share their views, there are cultures where eating dogs or practising cannibalism is common.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

My point is that our “body” is able to sustain itself on a diet that includes animal meat, out body has evolved to be able to process it. Including babies and dogs.

Your point is stupid and absolutely includes babies and dogs. You can digest those beings just fine.

Besides, while I don’t share their views, there are cultures where eating dogs or practicing cannibalism is common.

‘I’m not normalizing eating babies,’ proceeds to normalize eating babies

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

This is an ad hominem fallacy:

“Your point is stupid”

Oh, an this too:

“Dumb take”

Also, nice try with the straw man fallacy again! You’re really focused on including babies and dogs to invalidate my argument, when I never brought those up myself in the first place. Sure, I addressed them on my subsequent replies after you started with it.

We choose which meats or animals to eat. Just because our bodies can digest certain things doesn’t mean we should engage in unethical behavior. It’s called having self-control and moral principles, a detail you seem be consistently ignoring.

“I’m not normalizing eating babies,’ proceeds to normalize eating babies”

Will you stop, for a fucking second, with straw man bullshit? Or you won’t, because that’s your only bullshit resource? Tell me where, in this following fucking phrase did I use the word babies? I repeat: you are the who brought them up in the first place. If you’re projecting on me your repressed thoughts of eating or fucking babies, that ain’t my fault.

“Besides, while I don’t share their views, there are cultures where eating dogs or practicing cannibalism is common.”

Cannibalism doesn’t implicate eating babies, that’s on you. Also, acknowledging the existence of a practice doesn’t mean to normalize it.

Let’s take out of the equation your fallacies for a moment: Beef, pork and chicken are part of my diet, because my body can digest and sustain on them. Why shouldn’t I eat those?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 288K

    Comments