Alternative headline: National to spend $30m to sacrifice some of your lives so our trip is slightly faster.

The changes have been endorsed by transport researchers and street safety advocates as effective measures to help reduce the number of Kiwis killed and injured on the roads.

That’s all there is to it.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

It seems to depend on where you count your costs and benefits, and who is included in that.

Research seems to say that lower speeds are beneficial to society overall in a range of ways, National only seem to be counting car drivers and their right to continue taking up most of our public road space at the expense of everyone else.

https://www.canterbury.ac.nz/news/2022/lower-speed-limits-dont-just-save-lives-they-make-nz-towns-and-cities-better-places-to-live.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

OK, but this is talking about urban speed limits, whereas National’s focus is mostly on open road limits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

No it isn’t, they’ve said they’re rolling back both

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’ve said they’re rolling them back unless it wouldn’t be safe to do so, and most of their press talks about open road limits.

It sounds like most of the urban limits will stay.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Aotearoa / New Zealand

!newzealand@lemmy.nz

Create post

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month’s banner?

Community stats

  • 581

    Monthly active users

  • 807

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments