I never said anything about it being exclusively due to mistreatment. That is something you made up.
And I admitted I didn’t have evidence, so I have no idea why you’re complaining about me not having evidence.
Yes, but that’s not due to autism, that’s due to the way society treats autistic people
must be me, but i read that as pretty explicit and unambiguously exclusive language
And I admitted I didn’t have evidence, so I have no idea why you’re complaining about me not having evidence.
because i think going ‘well thats wrong, heres whats actually happening’ with 0 evidence is actually a pretty weird thing to do, as is maintaining that it just has to be true when challenged
Yes, it must be you. If I had meant it to be exclusive, I would have said “that is not solely due to autism, that is solely due to the way society treats autistic people”
But please, continue to berate me for not having the evidence I admit I don’t have. I’m sure that will lead to productive discussion.
i doubt there was any chance of a productive discussion past ‘well thats wrong, heres whats actually happening’ with 0 evidence and maintaining that it just has to be true when challenged
im doing this so folks reading this thread at least get the added context of the above being a complete unsourced guess
