In my opinion I don’t think that’s the right solution. I think cannabis is closer to coffee.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

If we engineered our roadways around the idea that people would be operating with a reduced reaction speed than normal, this would be fine. But we didn’t, everything is designed to be safe for normal operation.

Most isn’t good enough. If it impairs 10% of people, and increases fatalities even a little bit, it should be a DUI, unless there is some kind of medical exemption or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

It impairs maybe 10% of people. They should know better than to drive and the other 90% shouldn’t be held responsible for their mistake. But reduced reaction speed? Nah, THC is magical in that it’s a mental stimulant that almost slows down one’s perception of time, you clearly haven’t heard of hackey-sack or met anybody that plays FPS games at a serious level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You don’t get special rules just because you’re special. That’s just not how law works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

tell that to the police or anybody in law lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Okay but law unfairly targets and exploits substance users in the first place, and you’re missing my whole point- cannabis does not impair JUDGMENT, unlike alcohol. Regardless of what you think, the statistics show it is vastly safer than driving drunk. Besides that, any laws like this would be especially harmful to the average medicinal user being as THC levels fluctuate and it can stay in the body for up to months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t think it’s reasonable to say that because only 10% of drivers are reckless, we don’t get to regulate the other 90% along with them. Of course if we had some magical wand that would tell us who the reckless drivers are, then we could only target the dangerous folks, but often that’s impossible.

Often the best we can do is take a look at the data and see what kind of policies would not be horribly burdensome for the general public and yet would save a lot of lives, and then we institute those.

The other part of the problem with the 10% bad drivers argument is that bad drivers change from hour to hour, and from day to day. After all, the majority of people believe that they’re good drivers, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Trees

!trees@lemmy.world

Create post

A community centered around cannabis.

In the spirit of making Trees a welcoming and uplifting place for everyone, please follow our Commandments.

  1. Be Cool.
  2. I’m not kidding. Be nice to each other.
  3. Avoid low-effort posts

Community stats

  • 881

    Monthly active users

  • 523

    Posts

  • 5K

    Comments