Over 10 Years After It Was Announced, Star Citizen’s Single-Player Squadron 42 Is ‘Feature Complete’ - IGN::Star Citizen developer Cloud Imperium Games has said Squadron 42, the single-player portion of its controversial space sim, is finally “feature complete”, over a decade after it was announced.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
44 points

This game has taken so long that it’s either money laundering, the devs are just incompetent, or they suffer from the inability to edit themselves down

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Star Citizen has literally the highest budget of any game in history, by a factor of 2x. The second biggest one is Cyberpunk, which also has been in development since 2013. Gamedev has just spiraled a bit out of control and takes ridiculous amounts of time these days.

The only reason you see yearly releases of some other games is because they have multiple teams working in parallel and are just updating an already existing game engine. Doing stuff from scratch is a whole different thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Mostly agree with you here but I do have a minor correction. Cyberpunk was announced in 2013 but it didn’t actually start development until sometime in 2016 after cdpr release The Witcher 3: Blood and Wine DLC.

Meaning cyberpunk only took roughly 4-5 years of development time before being released. Though it arguably needed much more time than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Gamedev has just spiraled a bit out of control and takes ridiculous amounts of time these days.

Yes but also does an enormous amount of waste at the moment. Sorry it now takes years to make a good game but it doesn’t take a decade. Unless you’re seriously doing something wrong or it’s an entirely simulated universe with sepient life and everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

but it doesn’t take a decade.

GTA2 to GTA3, two years. GTAIV to GTAV, five years, GTAV to GTAVI 10 years and still waiting. See a pattern?

When you want to accurately simulate and animate every doorknob in the game it just takes a hell of a lot longer than putting a few pixel on a texture and calling it a day. And yes, there is in argument to be made that that level of detail doesn’t actually add to the gaming experience in a meaningful way, but that’s something a whole lot of AAA games struggle with and why we are seeing so many sequels and so little new things. StarCitizen just happens to be a new thing developed from scratch, including the studio itself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Games have gotten more complex and so have the teams to make them.

It use to be a few developers juggling multiple rolls to entire departments that only specialise in one thing.

To get all those different professions together to build a game is really hard because of communication. The best people are the ones who can do a bit of everything but large companies don’t want that, they want specialists who do one thing.

You can program? You can also create 3D assets? Your good at audio? Well tough you have to pick one and you’ll probably never interact outside your team.

And this leads to lots of fantastic ideas and creativity being lost not to mention bugs and other issues popping up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m sure there have been mistakes, but calling them incompetent is a bit of a stretch. Yes, it’s an absolutely eye watering amount of time and money, but they are trying to make an online universe with a high level of detail in which you can move between planets and all kinds of environments completely seamlessly. If they weren’t trying to make something with such a high level of difficulty, then I suspect they would have released a finished product by now, but they are making stuff nobody has made before, at least not at this scale.

Perhaps inability to scale things back is a bit of a problem, but I think Chris Roberts realises he’s not likely to get a chance to get a basically unlimited amount of money (in game dev terms) to make the ultimate dream game he and many other people always wanted, so I’d imagine that’s the reason they are just going all out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

How come other ambitious early access type projects don’t have this problem.

Beam.ng comes to mind, it’s not complete, but the pricing is reasonable, the progress is consistent and plentiful, and the product has been in a very fun engaging state for years and years.

And beam.ng is an incredibly ambitious project aiming for very high performing and accurate solid body physics simulation.

I don’t think Star citizen would get nearly the level of hate if they had a more sensical pricing scheme. $45 +$15 for the base game, ok makes sense, but then there are multiple subscription tiers, additional 1 time lifetime versions of the subscription, different shops for different subscription levels, individual ships, insurance, a mobile game like freemium/premium model (earn credits to buy real money stuff), as well as branching the single player and multiplayer experience into standalone products.

A big ambitious game is great, but no amount of tech CEO promises will make the segmented and confusing monetization scheme seem legit. The game has raised half a billion dollars. It has already made more money than 99% of games will ever make. That’s enough money to pay 300 people 120k for the 13/14 years the game has been in development. They have the ability to have a large studio that rivals (or beats) large AAA studios in talent, and they have used more time than even the most notorious studios use to develop games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Ah yes. Promotional ships that sell for $1000s of dollars irl that are only available in limited runs that you get to keep when the game launches into stable release.

Oops, forgot to mention that some of these ships might not ever be available outside of alpha besides for those that already own them. That means new players in stable will encounter ships they’ll never be able to own.

Most of my friends that play it say it’s a fair trade since you’re paying so much for them, but it still feels largely like a scam to me. You could do so such much better for yourself with that kind of money than just owning a digital asset.

Oh and those ships? They’re not tradeable to other players afaik.

Edit: This isn’t really fine at all and is in fact a P2W mechanic inside a game you already have to pay for up front.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How is star citizens progress not consistent and plentiful? They are pretty constantly releasing new content. Single player might be behind closed doors but the multiplayer gets all of the upgraded Tech New Missions new planet development new ships. There’s a pretty steady flow of new stuff and you only need $40 to get in.

If the only thing you’re interested in is the single player then that is unfortunate but it’s not as if they’ve delivered nothing over all this time. There is a game that is playable and has a surprising amount of content that you can go play right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Infinite feature creep

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not money laundering. It’s crowdfunding as a primary business model. The point isn’t to finish the game, but to keep baiting people with carrots-on-sticks until they get sick of the grift and the money dries up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

You think you can’t use crowdfunding as a vehicle to launder money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

I can’t imagine still thinking this after seeing that the game is actually releasing…

I was coming in here to see if the positivity actually carries over to various places as I was surprised to see all the positive YouTube comments on ign, but lemmy always seems to have a extra serving of negativity in all things… Oh well.

Don’t deprive yourself of a good time, if you have the means to play it I would absolutely check out star citizen when they have their free to play events.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh shit it’s releasing? When?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They got the same vibe going on as the 7 days to die devs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

this is a grievance i’ve needed validated for a long time. tysm

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Or all of the above

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The devs are not incompetent. Management is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think devs can also be incompetent

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If they ever release the game Chris Roberts’ hookers and blow pre-release starship income dries up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 553K

    Comments