Meanwhile in Germany:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-8 points

Where is nuclear fossil free? Show me the unranium tree please.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I was mistaken as i thought fossil free == renewable, but the definition is actually different, which makes “fossil free” a useless goal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Do you know what the word “fossil” means?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

The lobby green washed it, that’s how.

The term fossil free is just easier to accomplish, we should be using environment friendly, because that’s the goal.

The last time i checked, producing environmental dangerous trash for millenniums isn’t environment friendly.

Even in the best case it’s a bad solution, but now they are really really safe, not like before, trust me bro

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Uranium is a radioactive element. Part of the periodic table. Not organic. It was made by exploding stars mainly if my memory serves me right

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

ie not renewable

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

No, but still fossil free (which is how the original post described it).

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s not renewable but it is fossil free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Show me the rare earth tree for solar panels, or the carbon fiber tree for windmills.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

At least these material are theoretical recycleable while uranium is not (once an atom is split you don’t put it together again)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

You get that a “carbon fibre tree” is literally just a tree right?

(also, wind turbines tend to be made out of much cheaper glass fibre. Admittedly this does not grow on trees, but unless you’re willing to ban windows and home insulation too it doesn’t make that much sense to complain about it.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Rayon’s a different material, not carbon fibre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There is zero percent rare earth in solar panels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Even though it certainly isn’t renewable, Uranium is not a fossil fuel. That would imply it’s made with the remains of dead organisms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

It’s even worse than fossil fuel:

Carbondioxide has its natural circle, if we stop burning fossil fuels nature can remove carbondioxide by itself.

This does not work for uranium or plutonium, and the pathetic tries to get it into a circle have polluted e. g. Sellafield UK and other countrisides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

While all power plants have a one time carbon cost to build and decommission, there is a continuous carbon cost to mining nuclear fuel. I think that’s what GP was hinting at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Nuclear fuel lasts so long in modern reactors that it’s kinda a silly point though.

What you need to be looking at is lifetime carbon costs per kWh, that’s the only real meaningful comparison.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments

Community moderators