Meanwhile in Germany:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
30 points

Even though it certainly isn’t renewable, Uranium is not a fossil fuel. That would imply it’s made with the remains of dead organisms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

It’s even worse than fossil fuel:

Carbondioxide has its natural circle, if we stop burning fossil fuels nature can remove carbondioxide by itself.

This does not work for uranium or plutonium, and the pathetic tries to get it into a circle have polluted e. g. Sellafield UK and other countrisides.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

While all power plants have a one time carbon cost to build and decommission, there is a continuous carbon cost to mining nuclear fuel. I think that’s what GP was hinting at.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Nuclear fuel lasts so long in modern reactors that it’s kinda a silly point though.

What you need to be looking at is lifetime carbon costs per kWh, that’s the only real meaningful comparison.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

A Single tank lasting long is not necessarily a good thing. It means you have to put in the effort up front. It also does not negate the cost of fuel/W

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments

Community moderators