Meanwhile in Germany:

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

“Consequential cost to health and environnement” of nuclear if higher that coal ? Wtf, in what world ?

Coal is more radioactive than nuclear plant, and that’s the lesser issue, between air polution, plant burning, and the effect of that much co2 being released, that can’t be true.

Either it’s bullshit or I missunderstood the graph.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Europe

!europe@feddit.de

Create post

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments

Community moderators