G/O Media, an online media company that owns Gizmodo and Kotaku has announced that it will begin a “modest test” of AI content on its sites.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
93 points

The fact that I can open up ChatGPT right now and say “Write a Kotaku article about why Tetris is racist” and get a 100% believable result out of it should be a sign that they’ve been replaceable for a while now.

permalink
report
reply
72 points

Bahahaha, I just put that shit into ChatGPT and this is what I got:

https://chat.openai.com/share/20f322f8-76bc-4974-bb62-9b089fdd5297

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

WTF that is a whole load of baloney, it’s hilarious. Also a good reminder for us who lean left to remember to be critical when discussing such things too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Say what you will, I need myself a racially diverse tetris now. We should all aspire to be L shaped block.

It’s so hard to even make fun of that without sounding like I’m on the extreme right, but I am CACKLING

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

@Helldiver_M That reads exactly like a typical dumb shit Kotaku article. No wonder, because it was trained from human data. I don’t know what’s more shocking, that our News outlets by human is so bad we think a robot wrote it, or if the AI is that good that we think a human wrote it. Both perspectives are frightening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Video game journalism has been crappy for a long, loooong time. You ever read pre-Ziff Davis EGM or GamePro? It’s like a lobotomy in print form.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

That’s hilarious, and about on par with most of the writing on so-called journalism sites these days. Glorious!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Holy shit it’s spot on for the type of outrage baiting I expected. I’m really impressed

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s so much fluff.

Fun to read but honestly felt like watching an Ancient Aliens episodes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

at least it’s nonsense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why is every point marked ‘1.’ lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s the training data. Every list the bot has ever seen has had the number 1 in it. All other numbers come up less than that.

The bot also has no memory of what it wrote before, and no clue what it will write next. It simply guesses what the next word will be based on what the last word was.

Another failure of these bots, they’re Pre-Trained. It’s the “p” in the name. So anything they generate will be based on the training data, with no changes to the algorithm based on interacting with users. You can “convince” the bot of anything and the second you close that browser window, the bot basically resets to factory defaults.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have no idea lamo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Probably botched Markdown formatting. Ordered Markdown lists will automatically be ordered properly, so starting each point with ‘1.’ doesn’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Lmao it’s awesome, I haven’t read Kotaku in ages, so I don’t know if it sounds Kotaku-y enough, but holy damn I can totally imagine a human nutjob writing that shit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This sounds exactly like something Kotaku would write:

One of the key criticisms leveled at Tetris is the lack of diversity in its visual representation. The game predominantly features blocks of different shapes and colors, but the absence of any explicitly diverse or racially inclusive elements raises questions. In a world that is culturally diverse, the omission of representation within the game can be seen as a missed opportunity to promote inclusivity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Believable as in imitates the writing style, sure, but what’s the point if it’s factually incorrect?

From the article:

The company joins a growing number of media entities experimenting with the technology […] These trials have already led to a flood of error-laden, plagiarized, and poorly written content due to badly implemented — and, some would argue, inherently unsuited AI models — that still have a strong tendency to make up facts.

Hate on Kotaku all you want but they don’t make shit up as often as AI does

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

To be fair, Kotaku does sometimes make shit up. Like the Persona 5-Smash crossover lyrics being ableist thing. And they tried to double down on it for awhile if I recall right.

And yes, ChatGPT makes shit up all the time. More often then Kotaku.

I know in a post gamergate world, we need to be diligent for things like dog-whistles. And hating on Kotaku is arguably in dog-whistle territory. I guess in my opinion Kotaku is so bad, that we should be able to safely mock the crap out of them. I’m even more happy to mock any chuds that want to keep non cis-white-males out of games. They just weren’t relevant for this occasion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Hate on Kotaku all you want but they don’t make shit up as often as AI does

Oh they do. Take the whole kerfuffle around Kingdom Come.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have found that one of the more effective ways to use ChatGPT for writing is to not just tell it “write me an article about…” But to give it a list of all the facts and basic arguments you want to include in the article and then tell it to use those. Takes more work to gather those bits of information ahead of time, but not a lot more work - you could basically do a bunch of Googling and copy and paste bits and pieces of what you find to use as your starting data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s an amazing prompt. 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@Chozo Right? There is no need of this site anymore since I’ve got fingers and can use CGPT myself.

@postscarce

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 6.1K

    Comments

Community moderators