You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points

Wtf you talking about?!?! They raised the conscription age to 40. I just have friends who just finished their conscription. The mass majority of us already consider ourselves independent. We have our own currency, our own government, our own laws.

Best believe if Xi bear attacks, we are stepping up to beat those China-nese scums.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
*

Conscription period used to be 3 years, then 2, then 1, then 4 months. Finally it became too obvious that 4 months is a joke, so it’s being grudgingly raised back up, but only to 1 year. Still barely time to get any proper training done; for comparison, Israel’s conscription is almost 3 years and includes women.

The Taiwan government also persistently underpays military service members. The result is that it never hits its targets for professional (non-conscript) personnel, then wrings its hands about it…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That’s very different from your “Exhibit A”. Pretty far from what you said about eliminating conscription. Ya sure it’s 1 year now for now. The military thinks it’s enough for now. We pay the government for their expertise. We trust them here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

One year is barely enough to get proper training?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That was the entire point behind the “One Country, Multiple Interpretations” status quo, though?

The KMT was opting for economic integration and the CPC was ramping down their rhetoric, then the DPP comes in, fucks around, and finds out that a global superpower does actually have military power.

Reminder that, in recent history, China only crossed the Taiwan Strait median line after the US was allowed to conduct a FONOPS through the Taiwan Strait and declared it to be international waters. Prior relations between China and Taiwan dictated that the Taiwan Strait was territorial waters with dispute over who’s territory it was - the median line was used for this interpretation.

All this is to say: the status quo is breaking down and the US is happy to push against clear Chinese red lines, just as they were happy to push against clear Russian red lines. Meanwhile, we already know what the US would do in a similar situation: we can simply look at Cuba or towards any of the governments that the US has couped in South America.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You write like you haven’t paid attention to the whole Hong Kong situation at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For one, Hong Kong is under a completely different system… And the entire purpose of the Hong Kong extradition treaty was to cut off a loophole that allowed murderers and rapists and drug dealers to escape persecution in China through Hong Kong. The law was incredibly narrow and only applicable to cases tried by the Supreme People’s Court (equivalent to the heavily politicized Supreme Court of the United States, but less divided for obvious reasons).

You can look through all the past cases of the SPC… find me one that would be unreasonable for extradition. Are people so keen on protecting murderers and rapists?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 284K

    Comments