You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points

Thats waay more expensive

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s the only logic way to proceed, my hometown Madrid would be complete madness otherwise

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait wait wait. I’m confused. Madrid has a multimodal mass transit system with multiple tiers of value. It’s one of the cities that uses a tram system to connect its bus system to its metro rail. Am I misunderstanding what you’re trying to say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Helsinki has had trams from the beginning, and many new residential developments are being built with them in mind. Two examples are Jätkäsaari and Kalasatama.

Both use the tram lines to connect residents to the adjacent, already existing, metro line.

Extending the metro line with just one or two stations, 90 degrees off its existing tracks, would be STUPID levels of expensive in comparison.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Solarpunk Urbanism

!urbanism@slrpnk.net

Create post

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

  • Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City — In brief, the right to the city is the right to the production of a city. The labor of a worker is the source of most of the value of a commodity that is expropriated by the owner. The worker, therefore, has a right to benefit from that value denied to them. In the same way, the urban citizen produces and reproduces the city through their own daily actions. However, the the city is expropriated from the urbanite by the rich and the state. The right to the city is therefore the right to appropriate the city by and for those who make and remake it.

Checkout these related communities:

Community stats

  • 446

    Monthly active users

  • 218

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments