You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
33 points
*

Do anyone have that new article that was like, accusing them of genociding a desert because they turned it into a forest or some shit? I remember it form a year or so back. The reforested an area of desert and this journalist was losing him mind over it.

Edit:

https://lemmygrad.ml/post/414155

Ok apparently I posted about it and my memory is just that bad. Lmao. Thanks to comrade GrainEater for reminding me.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

The biggest criticism I’ve seen is that the planting project ended up being a huge monoculture of poplar trees, but that was kinda the norm back then in reforestation.

The last I heard the forest they planted was dying from a beetle infestation, and they were going to attempt a redo with a lot more species of trees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

But fostering biodiversity remains a challenge, conservationists say

Checkmate China, what’s the point if you can’t just magically spawn the Amazon forest

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

That is a valid concern. One of the largest problems with the project was that they planted massive monocultures of single trees. Something that is extremely dangerous as a single parasite, disease, or pest could annihilate hundreds of thousands of square kilometers.

Plus monocultures limit biodiversity to an extreme capacity as the entire forest is suitable only to a very limited number of species. It’s not that the animals aren’t there to begin with, it’s that not many can survive in the mass monoculture forest.

permalink
report
parent
reply

you posted this about a year ago, that might be it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

My memory really is just that bad. Lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Community stats

  • 762

    Monthly active users

  • 3K

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments