You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
16 points

Rust: it will take 10 months to build the app you want, but it will run super fast.

Zig: it will take 10 days to build the app you want, but it will run super fast.

You get to pick one cult. Which one is it?

permalink
report
reply
96 points
*

Rust: works

Zig: segmentation fault

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Also no higher-order functions like map, filter, reduce etc.

Really weird design decision for a brand new language.

Comptime is pretty dope tho, I wish Rust had that instead of relying on macros so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So how is Zig different from C or C++, then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Much nicer than C, much simpler than C++, much less cruft than both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@CanadaPlus @unique_hemp the biggest difference is that they don’t make any memory changes invisibly

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Rust has cute crab

Zig has scary lizard

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Zig isn’t even v1 and without any API stability guarantees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

It finished even faster when it crashes right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Development paradigms spearheaded by MySQL and PHP, where it was discovered that you can be really fast if you don’t care about getting the right answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I’d like to point out, the value add of Rust isn’t speed, it’s safety in a low-level language. C is also just as fast, it’s just that Rust guarantees safety in a wide class of potential catastrophic bugs with little to no runtime overhead, by using the design of the language and compiler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s very true. My main issue though is the steep learning curve

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Never heard of zig before, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Idk I just wrote a simple cli tool in 2 hours in Rust. Complete with arg validation, actually helpful --help output, and parallelisation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I dunno man… having “no macros” as a selling point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wanted to try zig a couple of times now but was always put off by lacking tooling and generally bad compiler errors. Its kinda hard to justify spending time on something if you see the compiler point out an error inside a standart lib zig file and there is no directon for a fix whatsoever. Im hoping it’ll get better because the language seems really great

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 34K

    Comments