You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
3 points

Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer. Friends say I am on the spectrum but the Psychologist said that doesn’t seem to be the case.

Like, OP1 is lame, OP2 supports genocide, etc. to clarify within a thread without having to quote or @ which I find a bit clumsy and generally gets in the way of flow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This sounds like a great idea!

I’ll clarify, I’m just putting out a reminder that being fascist is not an inherent trait, like green eyes or dark skin. Literally anyone can fall into the trap of fascist thinking. The only way to be truly anti-fascist is to recognize the warning signs in your own thoughts and worldview.

So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don’t demonize the practice of seeing both sides. Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For sure I think Nazis and Tankies are both gross, and I have a kind of out-group bias against them, but I never advocate for violence against them.

Except maybe punching Nazis, but nothing serious damaging or life threatening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So centrism can sometimes be a trap, but don’t demonize the practice of seeing both sides.

Wise words.

It’s how Peace is achieved.

Taking a hard line with one sides is a step on the path to becoming a fascist.

And War, and death.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wish there was common nomenclature for referring to posters or parts of a comment to make the context clearer.

For comments, that’s how I do it.

Throw one, too, or three asterisks around each side of the sentence you want to highlight.

No need for special verbage or nomenclature. It’s done visually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing. There’s a coherence that is lost.

I’m accustomed to reading books or essays where there might be an excerpt, but more likely a paraphrase of what the author considers their opponent’s argument to be. This makes it helpful at times to pinpoint a misunderstanding in the author.

But yeah, having consistent rules on the internet for posting is a losing battle I think. More or less thinking out loud, appreciate the comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah I think what I dislike about that is it breaks up the flow of whatever I am writing.

No, It doesn’t have to.

You can just write it out straight, without formatting, and then after you’re done that go back and add the asterisks to emphasize the parts that you want to emphasize, already having your thoughts jotted down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There should be a distinction between the OP of the thread and the OP of the comment imo. It can get confusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There should be a distinction between the OP of the thread and the OP of the comment imo.

OPT and OPC?

permalink
report
parent
reply

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Create post

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 5.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 938

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments

Community moderators