0 points
religion isn’t banned, overt expression of it is, those are two different things.
0 points
That’s pedantic, it’s still the government involving itself in policing religious expression.
You can’t use the excuse of separating church in state if you are utilizing the state to police the church.
0 points
except the church is literally not policed, how does it affect the church if your governnent employees can’t wear crosses to work?
get a fucking grip.
1 point
You do know when the constitution mentions the church, they aren’t being literal… The “church” is the institution of religious beliefs, which is made up of people. You are policing people’s rights to freely express their beliefs.
Are you harmed by someone wearing a cross when they work?
