The GOP’s war on racially diverse college campuses was never going to be confined to the party’s war on affirmative action.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
62 points

I wonder what their final solution will be for diversity?

permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

Black and brown people at the bottom ever subservient to a small elite of rich white cis straight men. It was never about the ‘unfairness’ of affirmative action. If it was you’ll also see them taking aim at the unfairness of legacy admissions as well. It has always been about keeping black and brown folk down and maintaining hierarchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

Couldn’t be that it was racist ineffective policy. No definitely not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I like how they made an actual argument that referenced real things the Republican party has actually done, and the best defense you could come up with was “nuh uh!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Are we also getting rid of legacy admissions? Or is that advantage acceptable?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Let’s use a simple metaphor. You have a bridge. One side of the bridge is heavier than the other, so it’s not balanced. You add a counterweight to balance the bridge.

Several years later, someone says “there’s no need for this counterweight anymore, it’s just unbalancing the bridge.” If the bridge was rebuilt to address the imbalances, you’d be right. But it wasn’t rebuilt, it’s the same bridge with the same flaws it had when the counterweight was put in place. In an ideal world, we wouldn’t need affirmative action. But pretending we’re in that ideal world isn’t actually solving anything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Probably craving for the chance to go back to segregation

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Final solution… I think I’ve heard that somewhere before, I wonder where… Might have been in another language, German maybe…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ach Quatsch! Das bildest du dir nur ein!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

To shower all the minorities in glory?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Rs are all about merit. They believe in pulling yourself up by your bootstraps. Like the old saying goes, “Arbeit macht frei”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lack thereof, probably

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Woosh

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Seems like their final solution is to stop basing scholarships, awards, and college placement off of the color of a person’s skin or their race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Actually it is to change it back to basing it off of wealth, family connections, and other things white people have more of than minorities.

So race based outcomes without saying it out loud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Median white household income in the U.S. - $74,262

Median black household income in the U.S. - $46,400

Maybe, possibly, black people need more help paying for college than white people?

Let me guess, that lower income is their own fault. Black people need to collectively pull themselves up by their bootstraps. I wonder if education has a part to play in that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah man, these fucking minorities need to pick themselves up by their great great grandparents bootstraps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, because eliminating cultural support programs does that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments