-17

How the Gaza ceasefire collapsed(www.axios.com)

posted
by
Avatar
Throwaway@lemm.eeM
in
Avatar
conservative@lemm.ee
10 comments
hidereport

Tried for a neutral source, but most importantly, Hamas shot first.

Sort:
HotTopControversialNewOld
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
Avatar
Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
-5 points

At some point the UN needs to step in and put a peace keeper on every corner of every street in Gaza.

That is one of my main problems with the UN, all talk, no action. We are witnessing mass murder of the people of Israel, and the UN does nothing.

If people think it’s genocide against the Palestinians (It is not), then they should welcome the UN to come in and root out Hamas and restore order.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
PizzaMan@lemm.ee
-1 points
*

We are witnessing mass murder of the people of Israel, and the UN does nothing.

If people think it’s genocide against the Palestinians (It is not)

If 2,000 dead Isrealis equates to genocide/mass murder, how does 15,000 dead Palestinians not count as genocide/mass murder?

then they should welcome the UN to come in and root out Hamas and restore order.

Yeah, because UN peacekeeping forces have never abused their power once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
Neuromancer@lemm.eeM
-1 points

No, genocide is a specfic action. It isn’t terror attacking Israel and then crying when they defend themselves. That isn’t genocide.

If it’s genocide as you claim, you should want it to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Avatar
PizzaMan@lemm.ee
-1 points
*

The killing of civilians is not self defense.

If it’s genocide as you claim, you should want it to stop.

I do want it to stop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Show more comments

Conservative

!conservative@lemm.ee

Create post

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee’s rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don’t reply to it.

Community stats

  • 1.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.2K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments

Community moderators