Commentary: Longtime former Republican on Patrick Deneen and the demise of the conservative intellectual

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
33 points

Name one conservative policy that has furthered mankind. Prohibition, voting rights, sexuality, drug war, terrorism; time after time they’ve been wrong. Even fiscally they run up the deficit. Their only role is to preserve hierarchy and maintain power

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

George W Bush massively expanded US Free Trade agreements. We went from 3 to 16 under his admin. That’s good for the entire world.

Pretty much the only thing I don’t like about Biden is his protectionist stance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’m gonna assume you think Capitalist expansion and colonialism is a good thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

The former, yes, the latter I bet we have significant disagreements on the definition of

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Progressivism is moving towards collective goals. Conservatism is protecting individual freedoms.

You many see individual freedoms differently than they do but that is the core fundamental policy they protect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Everyone living depends on huge networks of interdependent actors for basic survival. Never mind quality of life. The political reality of the individual is that they are the smallest and weakest political unit; least equipped to petition for change.

Conservatism may have individualism all over the label, but conformity is what’s inside the box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What you’re saying is true in theory, but the American Republican party has absolutely nothing in common with it.

Just look at the patriot act, torture, detention, TSA, and all the other shit pushed through by the GOP that has decimated freedoms and privacy.

The ONLY individual freedom the GOP protects unconditionally is for everyone and their uncle to own guns. Nevermind if your uncle is a lunatic, they’ll protect his freedom to be armed to the teeth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The republican party isn’t conservative. They are neo-conservative. Different problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

But they don’t protect individual freedoms.

They have taken a hard stance against body autonomy, free speech, individual identity - all in support of corporate and state control over the individual.

This is the same argument as saying conservatives are fiscally responsible. It’s just something people say with nothing historically supporting it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Neo-conservatism is what you are referring to and yes they are doing those things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Name one conservative policy that has furthered mankind.

Richard Nixon was at the helm when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was founded. I believe he also was responsible for protecting national parks, but I didn’t bother fact-checking that one.

https://www.epa.gov/history#:~:text=EPA was created on December,human health and the environment.

Now, granted, modern conservative politics are garbage-culture war bullshit, but we need to be cautious of forgetting history. Rewriting history is their game.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Progressive policies implemented during a conservative presidency don’t seem like conservative policies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If you can just hijack any and all “good” policies as inherently progressive then you’re just a self-fuelling fire who wants to hate conservatives no matter what.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You made me think about this. Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Intellectualism is not an inherently moral thing. One can be an amoral, selfish, narcissistic, intellectual.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I didn’t mean to give the impression that it is a moral issue. I consider it from a populist societal perspective. The majority (liberalism)wanting to do one thing, and the minority (conservatives) preventing progress. If conservatives had it their way, we’d still have feudalism… oh wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, that’s also taking an “us vs them” mentality that isn’t helpful either. The middle ground is where the vast majority of people sit, and often swing to one side or another based on the situation surrounding them. Taking a “If you’re not with me, you’re against me” stance, just puts those people off. Either they just refuse to engage (which is a big factor in lack of participation in voting in the US) or they move towards the people who are willing to pander them. More often than not the conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Those sound like the exact kinds of people who shouldn’t have any influence over our politics

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Those are core conservative "intellectuals’.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments