Police said the student was physically unharmed.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
148 points

Byers-Smith said she asked police to search the school bus lot, but they told her they first needed to search her house …

Uh huh.

ACAB

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Like…can they not do both? A fucking kindergartner is missing - we can walk and chew gum at the same time, yes? yes………?

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*

Why would police need to search a home that has been searched?? The problem is the child ISN’T in the house.

How in the flying fuck are you even getting upvoted for suggesting a violation of privacy? This country is braindead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Because they’re black, so obviously, they make/have illegal drugs in their house. It’s simple police-math. And they’ll shoot their dog, just for good measure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know if they needed to or not. But if they did for whatever reason, official procedure or what not regardless if I agree, then couldn’t both things be done in parallel.

I was not “suggesting” a privacy violation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Sounds like they’d rather go on a fishing expedition than do their jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

I don’t know man cops are shit but kids are great at hiding. How annoyed would you be if you went and searched all over the fucking county looking for this kid and you found out the kid was hiding behind an open door in their parents bedroom and fell asleep like I did to my parents when I was a kid.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

That’d require the child be home, first. Mom was worrying because he hadn’t come home from the bus and no one was picking up the phone at the school or the bus company. I’m going to guess that getting into the house would have been noticeable because calling the cops was not mom’s go-to move – and they proved her prioritization correct by being useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

But the cops have no reason to think the child is in the home at all? The mom called them because the bus never dropped him off and couldn’t get ahold of the school or bus company. She KNEW 100% her kid wasn’t home, they just refused to take her at her word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

“If you look closely you will notice she is black.”

-cops

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

She KNEW 100% her kid wasn’t home

It’s ok. The family is Black. They didn’t need to listen to her…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

yeah, you act kike children become invisible. I’d say they are actually not that great at hiding and police officers should be competent enough to find one. This story tells it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

…oof, that’s a bad typo there. Might want to fix that one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Oh no, the police might do part of their job that doesn’t involve harassing minorities!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How easy do you think it is to hide from 3 or 4 cops on a school bus?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

But he wasn’t hiding, he was lost and needed help being found. If the cops had listened to the mom he would’ve been found sooner without the unnecessary invasion of privacy.

The 5-year-old was honking the horn on the bus for help when he was found, she said.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 408K

    Comments