You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
12 points

Now we have a few famines in history to show us how gaining favor in a political system is not the best way to manage the land.

Doesn’t that also mean The Irish famine shows private land ownership isn’t the best way to manage land?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

The potato famine was caused by a new type of blight being brought from the Americas back to Europe.

I don’t see how being beaten by a novel disease has anything to do with private land ownership.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The blight affected all of Europe, yet only Ireland had severe famine because while the French government bought food for their citizens, the English government publicly declared the invisible hand of the free market would fix the famine.

Similarly the Ukraine famine was crop failure due to bad weather conditions that affected all of Eastern Europe. The crop failure wasn’t caused by the Soviets. Yet only Ukrainians died because the Soviets shipped Ukrainian food to Moscow in the same way Irish died because of free markets shipping Irish food to London. (Yes, Ireland was still a net exporter of food during the famine.)

When natural disasters occured it’s, “Millions died because of communism.” Yet when millions die under the free market it’s only the natural disaster and not capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

They grew enough potatoes to feed the population in spite of the blight losses. However said taters fetched a higher price abroad. So fuck the poor, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah ok, I didn’t consider that.

Hard to argue with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 289K

    Comments