Sexually explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X (formerly Twitter) over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated fake pornography and the challenge of stopping it from spreading.

X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
51 points

Is that hatred, or fear, that I hear in this comment?

That’s “suppressing theft masquerading as art is awesome” you hear in that comment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Ah, it was the third option, ignorance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I just wish my printer could actually print a car. 200mm bed is a little small

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Break it down into chunks and assemble it like Lego.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Ah, it was the third option, ignorance.

Oh, I’m not at all ignorant of how horrible generative " art " is, but I appreciate you checking on me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

If it’s horrible and it’s also “masquerading” as human art, what does that say about human art?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 81K

    Comments