You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
26 points

Sure, but as a general rule the carrot is a better incentive than the stick.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

Let’s not pretend these are kids who have a test for their first time. They all were told to not cheat and that cheating would lead to expulsion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I refuse to feel bad knowing that chances are they have been given an opportunity that many others would never get.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

They made their choice, but then rehabilitation should be the goal rather than cutting their hands off. Not that there’s not a time and place for cutting hands though.

This would be to mitigate societal loss rather than exert immediate justice, so the ones who are able and willing to change have the option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

On the flip side, all threat of consequences works as a deterrent only when there’s the expectation to be caught and punished.

By always catching but never handing out punishment to kids violating rules, you only teach them that consequences are inconsequential.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

To clarify, I wasn’t trying to argue there shouldn’t be consequences, just that depending on severity it must be proportional.

I want to compare it to the US justice system where, from an outsiders perspective, many are judged unnecessarily harsh. This makes it harder for people to “come back” after release and creates a societal loss.

I’ll end it there because I cba to write more but, eh, just my thoughts. Some nuance is lost in translation too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Your thoughts are valid and I agree – in principle.

The proportionate punishment does, however, depend on the severity of the violation. In an academic context, there are few things as severe as blatant plagiarism. Being caught in not just cheating but brazenly copy-pasting other people’s work can imho be appropriately punished with expulsion, be it in the US or elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

As a general rule, the stick is better than the carrot when teaching someone what not to do. But this guy’s goal isn’t to teach them “cheating is bad” but to weed out dishonest people too stupid to program.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Your flaw is thinking people believe there is a carrot at the end. I have no idea how these generations will get through and they all feel it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What’s the carrot for being honest then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A CS degree

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

?? When the cheaters are simply waved through the courses as well, some of them will definitely achieve a CS degree as well. They will simply have put in less work and be less well educated.

But in my experience people who cheat do so repeatedly, in multiple courses, their bachelor thesis, in exams when there is a way, …

permalink
report
parent
reply

Greentext

!greentext@sh.itjust.works

Create post

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you’re new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

  • Anon is often crazy.
  • Anon is often depressed.
  • Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 991

    Posts

  • 40K

    Comments