On the one hand: awww, poor cheater worldβs smallest violin meme
On the other hand: expulsion from the university for a first offense seems⦠harsh.
universities take plagiarism very seriously. Friend of mine teaches stage craft (how to make sets, props, costumes, lighting and sound design/planning/execution/engineering)
First semester, first test, easy pass: Someone pokes their head into the class and my friend goes to the door to answer them, stepping outside for like ~30 seconds
comes to mark the papers:
βIn a proscenium theater, what is the very front of the stage called?β
Real answer: apron
55% of the student answers: the same made up word that sounded vaguely Portuguese with no hits on Google.
even though itβs super dumb and super easy and barely matters at all and is a one word answer to a basic question - the students ended up being investigated by the university and my friend had all his classes audited.
Just wanna say I took a stage craft class as an elective many, many years ago when college was affordable enough to do such things.
We didnβt do anything hands on, just learned how stuff works.
It was one of my most favorite classes. I was a beer chugging, skirt chasing, never went to class burnout back then, but I enthusiastically went to that class every time.
I may be dumb, but to clarify: they were assumed cheating because the word was fake, and the only reason for so many duplicated fake answers would be if they shared a faulty answer sheet. Right?
yeah, I mean a forgivable wrong answer would be βdownstage centerβ βthe frontβ βthe lipβ βlimelightsβ βfootlightsβ βwingβ βlegβ βcurtainβ βpitβ - like close but wrong terminology or similar guesses.
The fact that loads of them said the same weird wrong answer was very sus.
Cheating is taken VERY seriously at every decent University. As it should.
Still, cheating to some extent exists everywhere. This just weeds out the real lazy or stupid cheaters. Which is also some kind of quality check, I guess.
To cheat properly, Iβve has to be a bit clever and shrewd, which is a valuable character trait. Maybe not the most moral one, but real life isnβt all moral either. π€·ββοΈ
Sometimes the best and most efficient solutions are created by just cleverly combining the work of others.
I will say up front that I am not a cheater - not because of good moral character, but because I am a terrible liar. Itβs less stressful to me to risk failure, than to risk being caught.
That said, a lot of cheating is excellent preparation for work in corporate America. I donβt like that it is, but it is. My main beef with capitalism is that it encourages, breeds, and rewards the absolute worst attributes of human nature. Thereβs literally nothing in capitalism that speaks to anything good in people. Knowing how to cheat, cheat profitably, and (most importantly) avoid being caught is perhaps one of the most useful skills in the American capitalist corporate space.
Doesnβt mean it has to be tolerated.
If a school is known to go easy on cheaters. Why would anyone actually trust a degree from that school?
You donβt learn by just copying someoneβs github repository and presenting it as your solution.
As someone said. βYou copied that function without understanding why it does what it does, and as a result your code IS GARBAGE. AGAIN.β
Itβs a masters program, I have no issue with high level cheaters getting slapped with consequences. When I was in undergrad, first offence was an immediate F in the class, with a second being expulsion. Given the requirements for masters/doctorate (my MIL got both while I was dating my wife), getting an F is probably going to bounce you from the program anyway, so itβs not that much difference IMO.
On the other hand: expulsion from the university for a first offense seems⦠harsh.
Iβm going to allege that such βeducationalβ institutionsβ focus on βcheatingβ is harmful and dangerous for their students.
Iβm a flight instructor. Students would show up to my class actually afraid to be caught writing things down to refer to them later. They were afraid to be caught using checklists. They would overwhelm themselves trying to commit entire technical manuals to memory. Thatβs not how anything actually works. The FAA prints all these references so pilots can read them. We donβt take them away from you when you pass your practical.
Checklist usage in the cockpit is a required skill to pass a practical test. The examiner has to see you using a checklist during the test in order to pass you. Writing things down so you can refer to them later, like flight planning and ATC clearances, also a required skill. Schools make people afraid to do these things.
If youβve got a kneeboard that has the tower light gun signal chart printed on it, and you lose the radio and need light gun signals, youβre not going to have your license taken away from you if you use that quick reference. Too many students bring that pressure into flight training with them. Itβs a fun bit of deprogramming to do.
Iβm going to allege that such βeducationalβ institutionsβ focus on βcheatingβ is harmful and dangerous for their students.
I wonβt disagree that the overall anti-cheating mentality goes too far, but this example was students literally plagiarizing their first project.
That mentality sounds like instructors arenβt properly setting expectations for students. If going over checklists is a required skill, students should be informed regularly that they need to be doing XYZ and should be writing that down. When I was still trying for my CS BS, that was something my profs did regularly. We could bring notes to the final, but you were still expected to write your own code (by hand) on the final.
That mentality sounds like instructors arenβt properly setting expectations for students. If going over checklists is a required skill, students should be informed regularly that they need to be doing XYZ and should be writing that down.
Yeah, thatβs what I meant by βitβs a fun bit of deprogramming to do.β Especially younger students are strongly conditioned to think of tests or performances as βclosed bookβ unless specifically informed otherwise and often demonstrate actual fear of being caught using reference materials or god forbid open a reference manual. Breaking them of that habit often takes more than βsetting expectations.β It can take some effort to get students to realize the game weβre playing here isnβt βYou have to know everything in all the textbooks,β itβs βYouβve got to know which book to find which answer in.β
Having gone back to college after becoming a flight instructor, Iβm strongly under the impression that college just doesnβt matter. There is no certification or accountability requirements for professors; no legal requirement for them to study the fundamentals of instruction, hell Iβm not convinced anyone actually interviewed some of my professors before hiring them.
I had an English professor tell me she βlikes to give students enough rope to hang themselves with.β I want you to imagine hearing that out of a flight instructor.
College professors seem to see themselves as gatekeepers rather than guides. Their classes have to be hard so that only the worthy graduate. Flying an airplane is already complex enough, my job as a flight instructor is to make the process of learning that complexity as easy and safe for my students as possible. What even is college if not corrupt?
I think itβs more that itβs in their masterβs capstone class. In undergrad, definitely too harsh. But for a masterβs program I get it
Yeah, that makes more sense.
Who TF is copying out of github for their masters, though, honestly?
I hope my Uni had this. I have never cheated, but cheaters sometimes have better grades than me.
I guess that would harm you if the class is graded on a curve. Iβm not saying they shouldnβt be caught and penalized, only that expulsion from the university is a harsh penalty. Automatic failure of the class would hurt plenty, without utterly destroying someoneβs life.