You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
87 points

Not so subtle reminder that YOU are not immune to propaganda.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Also propaganda doesn’t come exclusively from newspapers and magazines.

The best form of propaganda in the last couple of decades has been word of mouth.

Don’t trust anyone to tell you what to think. Look at the facts and only the facts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Those facts nobody tells you about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Whether someone tells you or you stumble on it yourself.

Peer reviewed studies, direct statistics, etc

A poll is a primary source. That’s good.

An article telling you about a poll is a secondary source. Be skeptical.

And above all, be very skeptical of anything that makes you feel intense emotion. Someone might be trying to make you feel that way so you’ll be less critical.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What is this, the 1900’s?

The best propaganda tool is obviously the internet: anonymous, spreads far and wide, can be automated

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think the biggest risk is the Internet as a propaganda tool disguised as word of mouth ‘grassroots’ opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“Word of mouth” imo includes direct person to person interaction on social media. Your Facebook friends, a sidebar on reddit or lemmy, a DM

That’s how I’ve always used the term.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Do yOuR owN ReSeARcH!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah but literally. Not “watch YouTube videos”. Look up a primary source - a statistic or a peer reviewed study.

The insidious part about the “do your own research” people is that they’ve managed to convince a generation of people to NOT do any research.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Imagine being downvoted for telling people to seek the truth in what they’re told.

This is lemmy now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Facts aren’t facts though.

Both sides of Covid had their facts, and after a few years, both sides had to admit they were wrong about certain things.

I think the other problem with only looking at facts is that it ignores the context.

Take 9/11 for example, the fact was terrorists attacked America, end of story.

But it misses the bigger picture; why did they attack America? There are no “facts” here. We can speculate, or we could take them at their word.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What an incredibly stupid take. There were hundreds of people trying to figure out why terrorists attacked America. There were books and scientific papers written about it. Just because you never looked into it doesn’t mean there’s no data.

You’re arguing against the concept of truth because you’re too lazy to pursue it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments