You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
8 points

Why not?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Because reading is an inherently human activity.

An LLM consuming data from a training model is not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

LLMs forcing us to take a look at ourselves and see if we’re really that special.

I don’t think we are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

For now, we’re special.

LLMs are far more training data-intensive, hardware-intensive, and energy-intensive than a human brain. They’re still very much a brute-force method of getting computers to work with language.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Because the LLM is also outputting the copyrighted material.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So could any human that got inspired by something…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.4K

    Posts

  • 78K

    Comments