You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
107 points

This is great.

I really wish more news sites set up their own instances. At the start I realize they wouldn’t be getting as many eyeballs, but it seems to make a lot of sense to have a @news@cnn.social or something. Then Wolf could have @Wolf.Blitzer@cnn.social.

Instant “verification” that way, too.

But we’ll see.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Wow. Decentralization as a whole will be a game changer for all corners of media, science etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Given how the fediverse is kinda like e-mail, this feels like a natural next step.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s a really great idea. It makes so much sense that it seems weird that it’s not already the way things are done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I had the same exact thoughts when the first twitter migration happened. I doubt we will see it, but I can dream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The only way they would do that is if they could monetize it somehow.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’d be another method to drive traffic to their websites and gain more ad revenue. Same as maintaining a presence on twitter or facebook, or providing an RSS feed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah totally.

I had the thought that since Threads “doesn’t want politics” on their platform, and Twitter is trash, maaaaybe activity pub could be a thing.

But you are right: they won’t do anything if it won’t make money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Isn’t their entire strategy to fish people onto their site, make money that way? Twitter doesn’t pay them either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Does CNN already own that domain?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

For some crazy reason they haven’t snatched it up yet. Atleast a domain seller website is saying it is free for pickings, if you want it.

Then again maybe their policy is to put everything as subdomain on cnn.com and make cnn.com their sole brand “if it’s not on cnn.com, it’s not that CNN”. Still i would have though they defensive register all relevant TLDs, even if they never ever use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t remember which pizza chain (or it has since been fixed) but something like papajohns.pizza used to redirect to dominos.com.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I have no idea. That’s just an example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah, okay, it would make more sense to say something like social.cnn.com since they already own and use cnn.com.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Agreed, not sure how I feel about governments setting up their own servers, but news organizations definitely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

How would you propose government officials officially distribute verified information? Just for government officials and distribution, that’s the whole point of having a .gov domain is so you can know it’s official

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Only employees can have an account on those servers. Registration is not open to the public.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fediverse

!fediverse@lemmy.world

Create post

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it’s related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.7K

    Posts

  • 62K

    Comments