You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
192 points

Not paying is very on brand for Trump.

permalink
report
reply
64 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-410 points

What’s your opinion on the slut who received $230k for a blowjob? Receiver shouldn’t be treated any holier than the payer, no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points
*

The hell are you even talking about? Neither giving, receiving, paying for, nor being paid for a blowjob are the problem. Paying $230k for a momentary indulgence while simultaneously defaulting on other obligations is the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points
*

Sure, criticize the woman for charging people for sex rather than the absolute chump who paid a quarter of a million dollars to hide the fact that he got his pee-pee sucked. That sure sounds like the type of smooth brain deflection a trump supporter would try, but the rest of us ain’t stupid or bigoted enough to fall for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
87 points

What’s your opinion on the slut who received $230k for a blowjob? Receiver shouldn’t be treated any holier than the payer, no?

Man did you miss the point. Here let me reword the statement to see if you get it this way:

“What would you expect after paying $230K for a fucking hamburger? How many times do you think he did that?”

Would you consider spending $230k on a single hamburger a savvy financial decision? Now imagine what you look like when you reply with:

“What’s your opinion on the restaurant who received $230k for a hamburger. Receiver shouldn’t be treated any holier than the payer, no?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

She seems very fiscally responsible and leveraged her skills into being overpaid for what she’s good at. Sounds like she did good. I’m proud of her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

I didn’t think there were enough people on Lemmy for this many downvotes, well done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I have no opinion on the person who made cash here. Sex work is still work. You, however, are an asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Dunno, but I can tell you my opinion on the cockwaffle in these comments calling women sluts, if you like?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Jesus fucking christ. Is this a real opinion? Like, not only is this the thought that came to your mind, but after going through the cognitive filter, you decided this is both an accurate and acceptable thing to say?

Reconsider your values and the harm/benefits they bring. You need help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Higher than my opinion of a born-rich never-worked-a-day-in-his-life conman who has to pay for sex.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Oh my sweet summer child.

There’s actually fairly few people who wouldn’t blow someone for $230k given the opportunity. There are however very few people who have been paid $230k for a blow.

I have mad respect for someone who can secure that kind of money for someone everyone else does for free.

You can call her a slut if that makes you feel better about yourself but I suspect that you’re really just envious of someone who is that desirable - I know I am.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

She got paid $230k to suck him off, while you would do it for free. I respect her more than I would respect you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I think he’s just mad that he can’t afford it

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Wow… what makes her more of a slut than Trump paying for it while married? (Looking at your profile, all your comments and posts have negative scores so I’m assuming you are just another troll)

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You seem jealous

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

No, using money stolen from your campaign to pay for it. And that besides the fact Trump is a sex offender as a matter of fact (eg Carrol). But even if it was not completely consensual, Ms Daniels would have no credibility in the US. So taking a payout was the best she could hope for.

The coverup is what gets them usually. And also here. Look at the hush money charges.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

My opinion is she was the smartest person in the room while giving said blow job. $230k for 30 seconds of work. You’d clearly do the same thing for 1% of that amount

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think I’m in the wrong business. How long does a BJ take? Like max 15 minutes, probably less once I get some more experience. I would just have to work one afternoon then be set for the year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

he’s a sad sack and she got a quarter million dollars for 2 minutes’ work, 5 if you count how long it took to find it underneath his hamberder belly. this isn’t a moral judgment, it’s just about his utter grossness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments