63 points

Numerous sources have said that this is a deliberate act of revenge by Republicans because Democrats didn’t jump in to save McCarthy’s speaker role. More are expected to come. This has got to rank up there with McConnell blaming Obama when one of his own bills blows up in his face, saying it’s Obama’s fault for not warning them hard enough even after they overrode his veto.

Of course, they’re so far doing nothing to the 8 Republicans who, you know, actually voted to remove McCarthy. Or Matt Gaetz, who started all this shit in the first place. Instead, they’re taking their frustrations out on a couple of 80+ year old representatives out of spite.

I also haven’t found out where this clown even has the authority to order this. His powers are literally only limited to recognizing the next nominee for Speaker, holding the vote, and sending the House to recess. I am unsure why both of these people haven’t just told him where he can shove his orders.

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Is this actually established? The actual language states “The Member acting as Speaker pro tempore under this provision may exercise such authorities of the Office of Speaker as may be necessary and appropriate pending the election of a Speaker or Speaker pro tempore.”

Per this:

It comes right after the part you quoted:

The authority of a Speaker pro tempore to exercise certain powers depends on whether he is designated, designated and approved, or elected. The powers of a designated Speaker pro tempore, compared with those of an elected Speaker pro tempore, are relatively limited. Deschler Ch 6 Sec. Sec. 10, 14.

Since he hasn’t been elected or “designated and approved”, his powers are much more limited. The other important words are “pending the election of a Speaker or Speaker Pro Tempore”. This has generally been interpreted as his powers are only limited to being what’s absolutely needed to elect a permanent Speaker. As virtually everybody has said that the HoR is essentially shut down for a week until the GOP comes up with a nominee, it looks like this interpretation is still holding.

This asshole is just stroking off to the GOP base with these evictions. Hopefully, they tell him to go fuck himself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Seeing as this has never happened in US history before… well it’s going to be a clusterfuck that the parliamentarian will no doubt have to weigh in on multiple times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Rep Jim McGovern has expressed some concerns about the validity of all this:

how would he know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The speaker pro tempore, which is the official title, can only recess the House, adjourn the chamber and recognize speaker nominations.

I don’t see allocating office space on that list.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

I feel like the one overriding tenet of the Republican party used to be party loyalty, but now they are all convinced that means the party should be loyal to it’s members, not the other way around. So while now the party can’t even hold a speaker and is fulll of infighting, you still see these petty anti-loyalty attacks like this.

I’d feel like it was more cutting if they weren’t constantly attacking each other as well.

permalink
report
reply
7 points
*

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Another example of how Republicans gain power and immediately try to do stuff then worry if theyre allowed.

While Dems get power and spend years deciding if they can do something before trying, and sometimes it still gets shut down and by then they’ve wasted too much time.

I wish Dems tried as hard as Republicans. When only one sides does stuff like this, it makes a fight pretty lopsided. Because Dems have to spend all their time undoing what republicans just did.

It puts us constantly on the defensive and why we’ve been slowly drifting to the right for decades now.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

You think that the Democrats not changing the locks on office doors out of spite makes them weak?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

No, I think Pelosi saying her replacement got the person she replaced getting an extra 30 days longer than she’s had is kind of pointless, and that extra 30 days would only be if he kept the office up to his resignation…

She’s had the extra office for 10 months now…

That’s more than enough time to move out.

It’s nowhere close to the most important issue right now, but it is a legitimate point that she should have been out long ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Fuck republicans. I’m so sick of this. What a bunch of brain dead crybabies.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 470K

    Comments